Demographics details for Boomer, NC vs Sharon, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Boomer, NC vs Sharon, MA.
Data | Boomer | Sharon |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,213 | 17,612 |
Median Age | 53.9 years | 40.5 years |
Median Income | $50,367 | $126,000 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 62.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 2% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Boomer vs Sharon
- The population in Sharon is higher at 17,612, compared to 1,213 in Boomer.
- Residents in Boomer have a higher median age of 53.9 years compared to 40.5 years in Sharon.
- Sharon has a higher median income of $126,000, compared to $50,367 in Boomer.
- In Sharon, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 44.0% in Boomer.
- Boomer has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 2% in Sharon.
- Sharon has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Boomer.
Demographics
Demographics Boomer vs Sharon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Boomer | Sharon |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 1.9 |
White | 91 | 88.2 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5.3 |
Hispanic | 2 | 3.5 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 2.0 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 0.1 |
Demographics Comparison: Boomer vs Sharon
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Boomer at 5% compared to 1.9% in Sharon.
- Boomer has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 88.2% in Sharon.
- In Sharon, the Asian population stands at 5.3%, greater than 0% in Boomer.
- Sharon has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3.5%, compared to 2% in Boomer.
- Both Boomer and Sharon have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 2%.
- In Sharon, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 0.1%, compared to 0% in Boomer.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Boomer | Sharon |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
Depression | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Boomer vs Sharon
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Boomer and Sharon at 0.0%.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 0.0%.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Boomer and Sharon at 0.0%.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Boomer and Sharon at 0.0%.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 0.0%.
- Disability percentages are higher in Boomer at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Boomer | Sharon |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 21.2% (257) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 25.9% (314) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.6% (116) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Boomer vs Sharon
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Boomer and Sharon at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Boomer hold a high school diploma at 21.2% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- More residents in Boomer have less than a high school education at 25.9% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Boomer hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.6% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.