Demographics details for Boomer, NC vs San clemente, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Boomer, NC vs San clemente, CA.
Data | Boomer | San clemente |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,213 | 63,457 |
Median Age | 53.9 years | 44.2 years |
Median Income | $50,367 | $134,730 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 49.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Boomer vs San clemente
- The population in San clemente is higher at 63,457, compared to 1,213 in Boomer.
- Residents in Boomer have a higher median age of 53.9 years compared to 44.2 years in San clemente.
- San clemente has a higher median income of $134,730, compared to $50,367 in Boomer.
- In San clemente, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 44.0% in Boomer.
- Boomer has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 7% in San clemente.
- San clemente has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.5% in Boomer.
Demographics
Demographics Boomer vs San clemente provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Boomer | San clemente |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 2 |
White | 91 | 64 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | 2 | 17 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Boomer vs San clemente
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Boomer at 5% compared to 2% in San clemente.
- Boomer has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 64% in San clemente.
- In San clemente, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Boomer.
- San clemente has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 2% in Boomer.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San clemente at 12%, compared to 2% in Boomer.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Boomer and San clemente at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Boomer | San clemente |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 14.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 8.6% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 18.9% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 8.9% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 19.0% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 25.4% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Boomer vs San clemente
- In San clemente, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.2% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Higher depression rates are seen in San clemente at 18.9% versus 0.0% in Boomer.
- San clemente has a higher smoking rate at 8.9% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in San clemente at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- San clemente has higher obesity rates at 25.4% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Disability percentages are higher in Boomer at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in San clemente.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Boomer | San clemente |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (574) |
High School Diploma | 21.2% (257) | 8.4% (5,352) |
Less than High School | 25.9% (314) | 7.8% (4,957) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.6% (116) | 36.1% (22,911) |
Education Levels Comparison: Boomer vs San clemente
- In San clemente, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Boomer hold a high school diploma at 21.2% compared to 8.4% in San clemente.
- More residents in Boomer have less than a high school education at 25.9% compared to 7.8% in San clemente.
- In San clemente, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.1% compared to 9.6% in Boomer.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.