Demographics details for Boomer, NC vs Central city, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Boomer, NC vs Central city, KY.
| Data | Boomer | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,213 | 5,810 |
| Median Age | 53.9 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $50,367 | $52,184 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Boomer vs Central city
- The population in Central city is higher at 5,810, compared to 1,213 in Boomer.
- Residents in Boomer have a higher median age of 53.9 years compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
- Central city has a higher median income of $52,184, compared to $50,367 in Boomer.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Boomer at 44.0% compared to 38.0% in Central city.
- The poverty level is higher in Central city at 16%, compared to 12% in Boomer.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Boomer and Central city at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Boomer vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Boomer | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 3 |
| White | 91 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Boomer vs Central city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Boomer at 5% compared to 3% in Central city.
- Boomer has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 88% in Central city.
- Both Boomer and Central city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Boomer and Central city at 2%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central city at 6%, compared to 2% in Boomer.
- In Central city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Boomer.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Boomer | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 15.5% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 26.8% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 24.8% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Boomer vs Central city
- In Central city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central city at 26.8% versus 0.0% in Boomer.
- Central city has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Central city at 14.8% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Central city has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Disability percentages are higher in Boomer at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Central city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Boomer | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.1% (65) |
| High School Diploma | 21.2% (257) | 15.4% (897) |
| Less than High School | 25.9% (314) | 15.6% (905) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.6% (116) | 8.3% (480) |
Education Levels Comparison: Boomer vs Central city
- In Central city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Boomer hold a high school diploma at 21.2% compared to 15.4% in Central city.
- More residents in Boomer have less than a high school education at 25.9% compared to 15.6% in Central city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Boomer hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.6% compared to 8.3% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.