Demographics details for Bonita springs, FL vs Earlham, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bonita springs, FL vs Earlham, IA.
| Data | Bonita springs | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 56,370 | 1,423 |
| Median Age | 60.2 years | 41.1 years |
| Median Income | $84,668 | $103,977 |
| Married Families | 54.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Bonita springs vs Earlham
- In Bonita springs, the population is higher at 56,370, compared to 1,423 in Earlham.
- Residents in Bonita springs have a higher median age of 60.2 years compared to 41.1 years in Earlham.
- Earlham has a higher median income of $103,977, compared to $84,668 in Bonita springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bonita springs at 54.0% compared to 45.0% in Earlham.
- Bonita springs has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Earlham.
- Earlham has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 3.1% in Bonita springs.
Demographics
Demographics Bonita springs vs Earlham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bonita springs | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 68 | 95 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 21 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bonita springs vs Earlham
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Bonita springs and Earlham at 2%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Earlham at 95% compared to 68% in Bonita springs.
- The Asian population is larger in Bonita springs at 1% compared to 0% in Earlham.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bonita springs at 21% compared to 1% in Earlham.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bonita springs at 8% compared to 2% in Earlham.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bonita springs and Earlham at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bonita springs | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 18.4% |
| Smoking | 16.1% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 23.0% |
| Obesity | 26.1% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bonita springs vs Earlham
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Bonita springs and Earlham at 14.4%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Earlham at 18.4% versus 17.7% in Bonita springs.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bonita springs at 16.1% compared to 14.6% in Earlham.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Earlham at 23.0% compared to 18.1% in Bonita springs.
- Earlham has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 26.1% in Bonita springs.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bonita springs at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Earlham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bonita springs | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (810) | 0.7% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 14.9% (8,384) | 13.8% (197) |
| Less than High School | 15.7% (8,845) | 6.0% (85) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.1% (18,684) | 17.0% (242) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bonita springs vs Earlham
- A higher percentage of residents in Bonita springs have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.7% in Earlham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bonita springs hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 13.8% in Earlham.
- More residents in Bonita springs have less than a high school education at 15.7% compared to 6.0% in Earlham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bonita springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.1% compared to 17.0% in Earlham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.