Demographics details for Bogue chitto, MS vs Tracy, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bogue chitto, MS vs Tracy, CA.
Data | Bogue chitto | Tracy |
---|---|---|
Population | 319 | 97,328 |
Median Age | 19.7 years | 34.4 years |
Median Income | $16,778 | $111,717 |
Married Families | 22.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 28% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Bogue chitto vs Tracy
- The population in Tracy is higher at 97,328, compared to 319 in Bogue chitto.
- The median age in Tracy is higher at 34.4 years, compared to 19.7 years in Bogue chitto.
- Tracy has a higher median income of $111,717, compared to $16,778 in Bogue chitto.
- In Tracy, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 22.0% in Bogue chitto.
- Bogue chitto has a higher poverty level at 28% compared to 9% in Tracy.
- Tracy has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Bogue chitto.
Demographics
Demographics Bogue chitto vs Tracy provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bogue chitto | Tracy |
---|---|---|
Black | 50 | 6 |
White | 30 | 17 |
Asian | 1 | 19 |
Hispanic | 10 | 40 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 17 |
American Indian | 93 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Bogue chitto vs Tracy
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bogue chitto at 50% compared to 6% in Tracy.
- Bogue chitto has a higher percentage of White residents at 30% compared to 17% in Tracy.
- In Tracy, the Asian population stands at 19%, greater than 1% in Bogue chitto.
- Tracy has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 40%, compared to 10% in Bogue chitto.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tracy at 17%, compared to 7% in Bogue chitto.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bogue chitto at 93% compared to 1% in Tracy.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bogue chitto | Tracy |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 10.4% |
Depression | 23.6% | 16.4% |
Smoking | 28.0% | 11.6% |
Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 16.4% |
Obesity | 43.6% | 31.6% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bogue chitto vs Tracy
- More residents in Bogue chitto report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 15.0% in Tracy.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bogue chitto at 23.6% compared to 16.4% in Tracy.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bogue chitto at 28.0% compared to 11.6% in Tracy.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Tracy at 16.4% compared to 15.2% in Bogue chitto.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bogue chitto at 43.6% compared to 31.6% in Tracy.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bogue chitto at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Tracy.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bogue chitto | Tracy |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (5) | 2.6% (2,492) |
High School Diploma | 5.0% (16) | 13.3% (12,979) |
Less than High School | 2.5% (8) | 17.0% (16,556) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (28) | 15.0% (14,572) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bogue chitto vs Tracy
- In Tracy, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 1.6% in Bogue chitto.
- In Tracy, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.3% compared to 5.0% in Bogue chitto.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tracy at 17.0%, compared to 2.5% in Bogue chitto.
- In Tracy, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 8.8% in Bogue chitto.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.