Demographics details for Bluefield, WV vs Pea ridge, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bluefield, WV vs Pea ridge, AR.
| Data | Bluefield | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,408 | 7,852 |
| Median Age | 43.9 years | 35.6 years |
| Median Income | $45,854 | $93,113 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Bluefield vs Pea ridge
- In Bluefield, the population is higher at 9,408, compared to 7,852 in Pea ridge.
- Residents in Bluefield have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 35.6 years in Pea ridge.
- Pea ridge has a higher median income of $93,113, compared to $45,854 in Bluefield.
- In Pea ridge, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 36.0% in Bluefield.
- Bluefield has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Pea ridge.
- Pea ridge has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.1% in Bluefield.
Demographics
Demographics Bluefield vs Pea ridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bluefield | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | 4 |
| White | 66 | 70 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Bluefield vs Pea ridge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bluefield at 23% compared to 4% in Pea ridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pea ridge at 70% compared to 66% in Bluefield.
- In Pea ridge, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Bluefield.
- Pea ridge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 3% in Bluefield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pea ridge at 15%, compared to 8% in Bluefield.
- In Pea ridge, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Bluefield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bluefield | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.1% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.9% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 28.4% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 21.4% | 17.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.0% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 46.3% | 34.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bluefield vs Pea ridge
- More residents in Bluefield report poor mental health at 22.1% compared to 18.0% in Pea ridge.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bluefield at 28.4% compared to 25.0% in Pea ridge.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bluefield at 21.4% compared to 17.9% in Pea ridge.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pea ridge at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Bluefield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bluefield at 46.3% compared to 34.8% in Pea ridge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bluefield at 27.0% compared to 12.0% in Pea ridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bluefield | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (21) | 0.3% (23) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (1,788) | 17.7% (1,390) |
| Less than High School | 16.0% (1,505) | 9.8% (773) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (1,826) | 14.4% (1,131) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bluefield vs Pea ridge
- In Pea ridge, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in Bluefield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bluefield hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 17.7% in Pea ridge.
- More residents in Bluefield have less than a high school education at 16.0% compared to 9.8% in Pea ridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bluefield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 14.4% in Pea ridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.