Demographics details for Bluefield, WV vs Burns, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bluefield, WV vs Burns, KS.
| Data | Bluefield | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,408 | 237 |
| Median Age | 43.9 years | 26.5 years |
| Median Income | $45,854 | $43,125 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 2.6 |
Population Comparison: Bluefield vs Burns
- In Bluefield, the population is higher at 9,408, compared to 237 in Burns.
- Residents in Bluefield have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 26.5 years in Burns.
- Bluefield has a higher median income of $45,854 compared to $43,125 in Burns.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bluefield at 36.0% compared to 31.0% in Burns.
- The poverty level is higher in Burns at 14%, compared to 12% in Bluefield.
- The unemployment rate in Bluefield is higher at 3.1%, compared to 2.6% in Burns.
Demographics
Demographics Bluefield vs Burns provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bluefield | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | Data is updating |
| White | 66 | 92 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bluefield vs Burns
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bluefield at 23% compared to 0% in Burns.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Burns at 92% compared to 66% in Bluefield.
- Both Bluefield and Burns have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Burns has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 3% in Bluefield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bluefield at 8% compared to 2% in Burns.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bluefield and Burns at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bluefield | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.1% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.9% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 28.4% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 21.4% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.0% | 19.2% |
| Obesity | 46.3% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bluefield vs Burns
- More residents in Bluefield report poor mental health at 22.1% compared to 15.5% in Burns.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bluefield at 28.4% compared to 21.2% in Burns.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bluefield at 21.4% compared to 17.4% in Burns.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Burns at 19.2% compared to 12.0% in Bluefield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bluefield at 46.3% compared to 36.5% in Burns.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bluefield at 27.0% compared to 23.0% in Burns.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bluefield | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (21) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (1,788) | 13.9% (33) |
| Less than High School | 16.0% (1,505) | 43.0% (102) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (1,826) | 6.3% (15) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bluefield vs Burns
- A higher percentage of residents in Bluefield have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Burns.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bluefield hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 13.9% in Burns.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Burns at 43.0%, compared to 16.0% in Bluefield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bluefield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 6.3% in Burns.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.