Demographics details for Blue mounds, WI vs Max meadows, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Blue mounds, WI vs Max meadows, VA.

Data Blue mounds Max meadows
Population 924 580
Median Age 37.0 years 47.2 years
Median Income $71,094 $73,683
Married Families 34.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 8% 5%
Unemployment Rate 2.4 3.5

Population Comparison: Blue mounds vs Max meadows

  • In Blue mounds, the population is higher at 924, compared to 580 in Max meadows.
  • The median age in Max meadows is higher at 47.2 years, compared to 37.0 years in Blue mounds.
  • Max meadows has a higher median income of $73,683, compared to $71,094 in Blue mounds.
  • In Max meadows, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 34.0% in Blue mounds.
  • Blue mounds has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Max meadows.
  • Max meadows has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.4% in Blue mounds.

Demographics

Demographics Blue mounds vs Max meadows provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Blue mounds Max meadows
Black 1 Data is updating
White 96 98
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 1 Data is updating
Two or More Races 2 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Blue mounds vs Max meadows

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Blue mounds at 1% compared to 0% in Max meadows.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Max meadows at 98% compared to 96% in Blue mounds.
  • Both Blue mounds and Max meadows have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Blue mounds at 1% compared to 0% in Max meadows.
  • Both Blue mounds and Max meadows have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 2%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Blue mounds and Max meadows at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Blue mounds Max meadows
Mental Health Not Good 13.4% 18.9%
Physical Health Not Good 7.8% 12.6%
Depression 24.2% 26.2%
Smoking 11.9% 20.4%
Binge Drinking 25.4% 17.9%
Obesity 27.3% 40.3%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Blue mounds vs Max meadows

  • In Max meadows, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 13.4% in Blue mounds.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Max meadows at 26.2% versus 24.2% in Blue mounds.
  • Max meadows has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 11.9% in Blue mounds.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Blue mounds at 25.4% compared to 17.9% in Max meadows.
  • Max meadows has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 27.3% in Blue mounds.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Blue mounds at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Max meadows.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Blue mounds Max meadows
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 15.3% (141) 37.1% (215)
Less than High School 9.0% (83) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.7% (182) 9.8% (57)

Education Levels Comparison: Blue mounds vs Max meadows

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Blue mounds and Max meadows at 0.0%.
  • In Max meadows, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 37.1% compared to 15.3% in Blue mounds.
  • More residents in Blue mounds have less than a high school education at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Max meadows.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Blue mounds hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.7% compared to 9.8% in Max meadows.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.