Demographics details for Blue mounds, WI vs Fairmont, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Blue mounds, WI vs Fairmont, NC.

Data Blue mounds Fairmont
Population 924 2,188
Median Age 37.0 years 48.1 years
Median Income $71,094 $31,731
Married Families 34.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level 8% 22%
Unemployment Rate 2.4 5.0

Population Comparison: Blue mounds vs Fairmont

  • The population in Fairmont is higher at 2,188, compared to 924 in Blue mounds.
  • The median age in Fairmont is higher at 48.1 years, compared to 37.0 years in Blue mounds.
  • Blue mounds has a higher median income of $71,094 compared to $31,731 in Fairmont.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Blue mounds at 34.0% compared to 25.0% in Fairmont.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fairmont at 22%, compared to 8% in Blue mounds.
  • Fairmont has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 2.4% in Blue mounds.

Demographics

Demographics Blue mounds vs Fairmont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Blue mounds Fairmont
Black 1 62
White 96 14
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 1 Data is updating
Two or More Races 2 1
American Indian Data is updating 23

Demographics Comparison: Blue mounds vs Fairmont

  • In Fairmont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 62% compared to 1% in Blue mounds.
  • Blue mounds has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 14% in Fairmont.
  • Both Blue mounds and Fairmont have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Blue mounds at 1% compared to 0% in Fairmont.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Blue mounds at 2% compared to 1% in Fairmont.
  • In Fairmont, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 23%, compared to 0% in Blue mounds.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Blue mounds Fairmont
Mental Health Not Good 13.4% 19.7%
Physical Health Not Good 7.8% 16.4%
Depression 24.2% 22.6%
Smoking 11.9% 26.0%
Binge Drinking 25.4% 12.7%
Obesity 27.3% 47.2%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 27.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Blue mounds vs Fairmont

  • In Fairmont, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 13.4% in Blue mounds.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Blue mounds at 24.2% compared to 22.6% in Fairmont.
  • Fairmont has a higher smoking rate at 26.0% compared to 11.9% in Blue mounds.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Blue mounds at 25.4% compared to 12.7% in Fairmont.
  • Fairmont has higher obesity rates at 47.2% compared to 27.3% in Blue mounds.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairmont at 27.0% compared to 11.0% in Blue mounds.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Blue mounds Fairmont
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.3% (7)
High School Diploma 15.3% (141) 27.5% (602)
Less than High School 9.0% (83) 12.9% (282)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.7% (182) 14.4% (316)

Education Levels Comparison: Blue mounds vs Fairmont

  • In Fairmont, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Blue mounds.
  • In Fairmont, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.5% compared to 15.3% in Blue mounds.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fairmont at 12.9%, compared to 9.0% in Blue mounds.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Blue mounds hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.7% compared to 14.4% in Fairmont.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.