Environment details: Blue island IL
lower quality due to contamination.
Environment details: Kingman AZ
Moderate quality; some indicators of contamination.
Compare Environment: Blue island IL vs Kingman AZ
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Blue island | Kingman |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 1474 | 664 |
| Water Quality | 4/10 | 5/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | lower quality due to contamination. | Moderate quality; some indicators of contamination. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.81 | 1.95 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 49 | 66 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Blue island vs Kingman
- The water quality in Kingman is superior at 5/10 compared to 4/10 in Blue island.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Kingman with an average index of 1.95 compared to 1.81 in Blue island.
- Kingman experiences more days with poor air quality at 66 compared to 49 in Blue island.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.