Demographics details for Blountstown, FL vs Viborg, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Blountstown, FL vs Viborg, SD.
Data | Blountstown | Viborg |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,255 | 824 |
Median Age | 41.4 years | 50.3 years |
Median Income | $38,051 | $46,316 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 22% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Blountstown vs Viborg
- In Blountstown, the population is higher at 2,255, compared to 824 in Viborg.
- The median age in Viborg is higher at 50.3 years, compared to 41.4 years in Blountstown.
- Viborg has a higher median income of $46,316, compared to $38,051 in Blountstown.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Blountstown at 42.0% compared to 31.0% in Viborg.
- Blountstown has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 12% in Viborg.
- The unemployment rate in Blountstown is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Viborg.
Demographics
Demographics Blountstown vs Viborg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Blountstown | Viborg |
---|---|---|
Black | 33 | Data is updating |
White | 36 | 91 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 10 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 21 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Blountstown vs Viborg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Blountstown at 33% compared to 0% in Viborg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Viborg at 91% compared to 36% in Blountstown.
- Both Blountstown and Viborg have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Blountstown at 10% compared to 4% in Viborg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Blountstown at 21% compared to 4% in Viborg.
- In Viborg, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Blountstown.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Blountstown | Viborg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 13.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 9.5% |
Depression | 21.5% | 18.1% |
Smoking | 25.5% | 17.4% |
Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 20.1% |
Obesity | 38.5% | 35.2% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Blountstown vs Viborg
- More residents in Blountstown report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 13.8% in Viborg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Blountstown at 21.5% compared to 18.1% in Viborg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Blountstown at 25.5% compared to 17.4% in Viborg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Viborg at 20.1% compared to 15.3% in Blountstown.
- Obesity rates are higher in Blountstown at 38.5% compared to 35.2% in Viborg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Blountstown at 23.0% compared to 12.0% in Viborg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Blountstown | Viborg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (20) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 33.8% (763) | 22.8% (188) |
Less than High School | 19.8% (447) | 14.2% (117) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.5% (326) | 14.6% (120) |
Education Levels Comparison: Blountstown vs Viborg
- A higher percentage of residents in Blountstown have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Viborg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Blountstown hold a high school diploma at 33.8% compared to 22.8% in Viborg.
- More residents in Blountstown have less than a high school education at 19.8% compared to 14.2% in Viborg.
- In Viborg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 14.5% in Blountstown.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.