Demographics details for Blountstown, FL vs Clinton, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Blountstown, FL vs Clinton, SC.
| Data | Blountstown | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,255 | 7,554 |
| Median Age | 41.4 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $38,051 | $38,350 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 19.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Blountstown vs Clinton
- The population in Clinton is higher at 7,554, compared to 2,255 in Blountstown.
- Residents in Blountstown have a higher median age of 41.4 years compared to 35.4 years in Clinton.
- Clinton has a higher median income of $38,350, compared to $38,051 in Blountstown.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Blountstown at 42.0% compared to 19.0% in Clinton.
- Blountstown has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 18% in Clinton.
- Clinton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Blountstown.
Demographics
Demographics Blountstown vs Clinton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Blountstown | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 33 | 38 |
| White | 36 | 55 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Blountstown vs Clinton
- In Clinton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 33% in Blountstown.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clinton at 55% compared to 36% in Blountstown.
- In Clinton, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Blountstown.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Blountstown at 10% compared to 1% in Clinton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Blountstown at 21% compared to 4% in Clinton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Blountstown and Clinton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Blountstown | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 21.5% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 25.5% | 22.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Blountstown vs Clinton
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Blountstown and Clinton at 19.1%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clinton at 23.7% versus 21.5% in Blountstown.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Blountstown at 25.5% compared to 22.0% in Clinton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clinton at 15.8% compared to 15.3% in Blountstown.
- Clinton has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 38.5% in Blountstown.
- Disability percentages are higher in Blountstown at 23.0% compared to 17.0% in Clinton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Blountstown | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (20) | 1.0% (74) |
| High School Diploma | 33.8% (763) | 19.3% (1,460) |
| Less than High School | 19.8% (447) | 15.6% (1,177) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.5% (326) | 17.3% (1,310) |
Education Levels Comparison: Blountstown vs Clinton
- In Clinton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.9% in Blountstown.
- A higher percentage of residents in Blountstown hold a high school diploma at 33.8% compared to 19.3% in Clinton.
- More residents in Blountstown have less than a high school education at 19.8% compared to 15.6% in Clinton.
- In Clinton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 14.5% in Blountstown.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.