Demographics details for Bloomington, IN vs Murfreesboro, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bloomington, IN vs Murfreesboro, TN.

Data Bloomington Murfreesboro
Population 79,107 162,398
Median Age 24.4 years 31.5 years
Median Income $46,543 $70,451
Married Families 23.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 18% 10%
Unemployment Rate 6.2 3.0

Population Comparison: Bloomington vs Murfreesboro

  • The population in Murfreesboro is higher at 162,398, compared to 79,107 in Bloomington.
  • The median age in Murfreesboro is higher at 31.5 years, compared to 24.4 years in Bloomington.
  • Murfreesboro has a higher median income of $70,451, compared to $46,543 in Bloomington.
  • In Murfreesboro, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 23.0% in Bloomington.
  • Bloomington has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Murfreesboro.
  • The unemployment rate in Bloomington is higher at 6.2%, compared to 3.0% in Murfreesboro.

Demographics

Demographics Bloomington vs Murfreesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bloomington Murfreesboro
Black 5 17
White 75 66
Asian 11 3
Hispanic 4 7
Two or More Races 5 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Bloomington vs Murfreesboro

  • In Murfreesboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 5% in Bloomington.
  • Bloomington has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 66% in Murfreesboro.
  • The Asian population is larger in Bloomington at 11% compared to 3% in Murfreesboro.
  • Murfreesboro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 4% in Bloomington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Murfreesboro at 7%, compared to 5% in Bloomington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bloomington and Murfreesboro at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bloomington Murfreesboro
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 18.1%
Physical Health Not Good 11.7% 11.6%
Depression 26.7% 26.5%
Smoking 17.0% 18.3%
Binge Drinking 16.7% 15.5%
Obesity 34.4% 34.8%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bloomington vs Murfreesboro

  • In Murfreesboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 17.6% in Bloomington.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Bloomington at 26.7% compared to 26.5% in Murfreesboro.
  • Murfreesboro has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 17.0% in Bloomington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Bloomington at 16.7% compared to 15.5% in Murfreesboro.
  • Murfreesboro has higher obesity rates at 34.8% compared to 34.4% in Bloomington.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Bloomington and Murfreesboro at 9.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bloomington Murfreesboro
No Schooling 0.1% (95) 0.6% (920)
High School Diploma 5.8% (4,606) 10.7% (17,362)
Less than High School 4.2% (3,311) 6.2% (10,101)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 29.0% (22,911) 23.4% (38,019)

Education Levels Comparison: Bloomington vs Murfreesboro

  • In Murfreesboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.1% in Bloomington.
  • In Murfreesboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.7% compared to 5.8% in Bloomington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Murfreesboro at 6.2%, compared to 4.2% in Bloomington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bloomington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.0% compared to 23.4% in Murfreesboro.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.