Demographics details for Bloomington, IN vs Leander, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bloomington, IN vs Leander, TX.
Data | Bloomington | Leander |
---|---|---|
Population | 79,107 | 74,375 |
Median Age | 24.4 years | 35.5 years |
Median Income | $46,543 | $129,684 |
Married Families | 23.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Bloomington vs Leander
- In Bloomington, the population is higher at 79,107, compared to 74,375 in Leander.
- The median age in Leander is higher at 35.5 years, compared to 24.4 years in Bloomington.
- Leander has a higher median income of $129,684, compared to $46,543 in Bloomington.
- In Leander, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 23.0% in Bloomington.
- Bloomington has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 5% in Leander.
- The unemployment rate in Bloomington is higher at 6.2%, compared to 4.0% in Leander.
Demographics
Demographics Bloomington vs Leander provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bloomington | Leander |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 5 |
White | 75 | 57 |
Asian | 11 | 7 |
Hispanic | 4 | 20 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bloomington vs Leander
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Bloomington and Leander at 5%.
- Bloomington has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 57% in Leander.
- The Asian population is larger in Bloomington at 11% compared to 7% in Leander.
- Leander has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 4% in Bloomington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Leander at 11%, compared to 5% in Bloomington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bloomington and Leander at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bloomington | Leander |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 15.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 9.5% |
Depression | 26.7% | 24.7% |
Smoking | 17.0% | 12.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 17.8% |
Obesity | 34.4% | 32.7% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bloomington vs Leander
- More residents in Bloomington report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.7% in Leander.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bloomington at 26.7% compared to 24.7% in Leander.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bloomington at 17.0% compared to 12.4% in Leander.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Leander at 17.8% compared to 16.7% in Bloomington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bloomington at 34.4% compared to 32.7% in Leander.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bloomington at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Leander.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bloomington | Leander |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (95) | 0.6% (422) |
High School Diploma | 5.8% (4,606) | 7.1% (5,306) |
Less than High School | 4.2% (3,311) | 4.3% (3,162) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.0% (22,911) | 26.4% (19,620) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bloomington vs Leander
- In Leander, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.1% in Bloomington.
- In Leander, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 7.1% compared to 5.8% in Bloomington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Leander at 4.3%, compared to 4.2% in Bloomington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bloomington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.0% compared to 26.4% in Leander.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.