Demographics details for Bloomington, IN vs Kendall park, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bloomington, IN vs Kendall park, NJ.

Data Bloomington Kendall park
Population 79,107 10,624
Median Age 24.4 years 44.5 years
Median Income $46,543 $159,362
Married Families 23.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level 18% 2%
Unemployment Rate 6.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Bloomington vs Kendall park

  • In Bloomington, the population is higher at 79,107, compared to 10,624 in Kendall park.
  • The median age in Kendall park is higher at 44.5 years, compared to 24.4 years in Bloomington.
  • Kendall park has a higher median income of $159,362, compared to $46,543 in Bloomington.
  • In Kendall park, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 23.0% in Bloomington.
  • Bloomington has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 2% in Kendall park.
  • The unemployment rate in Bloomington is higher at 6.2%, compared to 3.5% in Kendall park.

Demographics

Demographics Bloomington vs Kendall park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bloomington Kendall park
Black 5 3
White 75 46
Asian 11 31
Hispanic 4 14
Two or More Races 5 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Bloomington vs Kendall park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bloomington at 5% compared to 3% in Kendall park.
  • Bloomington has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 46% in Kendall park.
  • In Kendall park, the Asian population stands at 31%, greater than 11% in Bloomington.
  • Kendall park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 4% in Bloomington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kendall park at 6%, compared to 5% in Bloomington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bloomington and Kendall park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bloomington Kendall park
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 12.5%
Physical Health Not Good 11.7% 7.2%
Depression 26.7% 17.6%
Smoking 17.0% 8.6%
Binge Drinking 16.7% 15.0%
Obesity 34.4% 25.1%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bloomington vs Kendall park

  • More residents in Bloomington report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 12.5% in Kendall park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Bloomington at 26.7% compared to 17.6% in Kendall park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Bloomington at 17.0% compared to 8.6% in Kendall park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Bloomington at 16.7% compared to 15.0% in Kendall park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Bloomington at 34.4% compared to 25.1% in Kendall park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kendall park at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Bloomington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bloomington Kendall park
No Schooling 0.1% (95) 0.2% (25)
High School Diploma 5.8% (4,606) 11.8% (1,256)
Less than High School 4.2% (3,311) 9.3% (992)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 29.0% (22,911) 38.1% (4,052)

Education Levels Comparison: Bloomington vs Kendall park

  • In Kendall park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.1% in Bloomington.
  • In Kendall park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.8% compared to 5.8% in Bloomington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kendall park at 9.3%, compared to 4.2% in Bloomington.
  • In Kendall park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 29.0% in Bloomington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.