Demographics details for Bloomington, CA vs Grand rapids, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bloomington, CA vs Grand rapids, MI.

Data Bloomington Grand rapids
Population 23,051 196,908
Median Age 32.5 years 31.8 years
Median Income $74,414 $61,634
Married Families 37.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 15% 14%
Unemployment Rate 7.5 5.3

Population Comparison: Bloomington vs Grand rapids

  • The population in Grand rapids is higher at 196,908, compared to 23,051 in Bloomington.
  • Residents in Bloomington have a higher median age of 32.5 years compared to 31.8 years in Grand rapids.
  • Bloomington has a higher median income of $74,414 compared to $61,634 in Grand rapids.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Bloomington at 37.0% compared to 31.0% in Grand rapids.
  • Bloomington has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 14% in Grand rapids.
  • The unemployment rate in Bloomington is higher at 7.5%, compared to 5.3% in Grand rapids.

Demographics

Demographics Bloomington vs Grand rapids provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bloomington Grand rapids
Black 1 18
White -9 51
Asian 1 3
Hispanic 88 16
Two or More Races 18 11
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Bloomington vs Grand rapids

  • In Grand rapids, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 1% in Bloomington.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Grand rapids at 51% compared to -9% in Bloomington.
  • In Grand rapids, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Bloomington.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Bloomington at 88% compared to 16% in Grand rapids.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Bloomington at 18% compared to 11% in Grand rapids.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bloomington and Grand rapids at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bloomington Grand rapids
Mental Health Not Good 17.4% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good 14.7% 11.5%
Depression 18.2% 25.3%
Smoking 14.4% 17.3%
Binge Drinking 14.9% 16.7%
Obesity 41.1% 34.9%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bloomington vs Grand rapids

  • In Grand rapids, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 17.4% in Bloomington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Grand rapids at 25.3% versus 18.2% in Bloomington.
  • Grand rapids has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 14.4% in Bloomington.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Grand rapids at 16.7% compared to 14.9% in Bloomington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Bloomington at 41.1% compared to 34.9% in Grand rapids.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grand rapids at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Bloomington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bloomington Grand rapids
No Schooling 3.9% (906) 1.2% (2,304)
High School Diploma 15.7% (3,618) 12.4% (24,420)
Less than High School 48.5% (11,184) 12.2% (23,971)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 5.9% (1,351) 25.6% (50,441)

Education Levels Comparison: Bloomington vs Grand rapids

  • A higher percentage of residents in Bloomington have no formal schooling at 3.9% compared to 1.2% in Grand rapids.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bloomington hold a high school diploma at 15.7% compared to 12.4% in Grand rapids.
  • More residents in Bloomington have less than a high school education at 48.5% compared to 12.2% in Grand rapids.
  • In Grand rapids, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.6% compared to 5.9% in Bloomington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.