Demographics details for Bloomfield, KY vs Central point, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bloomfield, KY vs Central point, OR.

Data Bloomfield Central point
Population 970 19,222
Median Age 52.4 years 40.3 years
Median Income $44,922 $79,731
Married Families 49.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 10% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Bloomfield vs Central point

  • The population in Central point is higher at 19,222, compared to 970 in Bloomfield.
  • Residents in Bloomfield have a higher median age of 52.4 years compared to 40.3 years in Central point.
  • Central point has a higher median income of $79,731, compared to $44,922 in Bloomfield.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Bloomfield at 49.0% compared to 45.0% in Central point.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Bloomfield and Central point at 10%.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Bloomfield and Central point at 4.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Bloomfield vs Central point provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bloomfield Central point
Black 2 Data is updating
White 94 76
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 1 15
Two or More Races 3 7
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Bloomfield vs Central point

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bloomfield at 2% compared to 0% in Central point.
  • Bloomfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 76% in Central point.
  • In Central point, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Bloomfield.
  • Central point has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 1% in Bloomfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central point at 7%, compared to 3% in Bloomfield.
  • In Central point, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Bloomfield.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bloomfield Central point
Mental Health Not Good 19.3% 19.4%
Physical Health Not Good 14.0% 12.0%
Depression 27.4% 29.4%
Smoking 22.2% 16.7%
Binge Drinking 15.6% 16.5%
Obesity 38.5% 30.1%
Disability Percentage 29.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bloomfield vs Central point

  • In Central point, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 19.3% in Bloomfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Central point at 29.4% versus 27.4% in Bloomfield.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Bloomfield at 22.2% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Central point at 16.5% compared to 15.6% in Bloomfield.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Bloomfield at 38.5% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Bloomfield at 29.0% compared to 11.0% in Central point.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bloomfield Central point
No Schooling 0.5% (5) 1.7% (319)
High School Diploma 19.7% (191) 16.1% (3,095)
Less than High School 14.2% (138) 13.2% (2,530)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.3% (187) 15.6% (3,003)

Education Levels Comparison: Bloomfield vs Central point

  • In Central point, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.5% in Bloomfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bloomfield hold a high school diploma at 19.7% compared to 16.1% in Central point.
  • More residents in Bloomfield have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 13.2% in Central point.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bloomfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 15.6% in Central point.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.