Demographics details for Blakely, GA vs Gresham, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Blakely, GA vs Gresham, OR.
| Data | Blakely | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,238 | 111,621 |
| Median Age | 31.5 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $43,008 | $69,437 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 26% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Blakely vs Gresham
- The population in Gresham is higher at 111,621, compared to 5,238 in Blakely.
- The median age in Gresham is higher at 37.3 years, compared to 31.5 years in Blakely.
- Gresham has a higher median income of $69,437, compared to $43,008 in Blakely.
- In Gresham, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 27.0% in Blakely.
- Blakely has a higher poverty level at 26% compared to 13% in Gresham.
- Gresham has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.7% in Blakely.
Demographics
Demographics Blakely vs Gresham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Blakely | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 77 | 4 |
| White | 22 | 55 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Blakely vs Gresham
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Blakely at 77% compared to 4% in Gresham.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gresham at 55% compared to 22% in Blakely.
- In Gresham, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Blakely.
- Gresham has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 0% in Blakely.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gresham at 13%, compared to 1% in Blakely.
- In Gresham, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Blakely.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Blakely | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 28.4% |
| Smoking | 23.4% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.4% | 20.2% |
| Obesity | 44.6% | 28.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Blakely vs Gresham
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Blakely and Gresham at 20.0%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gresham at 28.4% versus 21.3% in Blakely.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Blakely at 23.4% compared to 17.6% in Gresham.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gresham at 20.2% compared to 12.4% in Blakely.
- Obesity rates are higher in Blakely at 44.6% compared to 28.6% in Gresham.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gresham at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Blakely.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Blakely | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (35) | 1.6% (1,757) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (985) | 15.0% (16,776) |
| Less than High School | 14.5% (759) | 16.5% (18,399) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.1% (320) | 16.2% (18,082) |
Education Levels Comparison: Blakely vs Gresham
- In Gresham, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.7% in Blakely.
- A higher percentage of residents in Blakely hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 15.0% in Gresham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gresham at 16.5%, compared to 14.5% in Blakely.
- In Gresham, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 6.1% in Blakely.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.