Demographics details for Blakely, GA vs Cedar rapids, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Blakely, GA vs Cedar rapids, IA.
Data | Blakely | Cedar rapids |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,238 | 136,429 |
Median Age | 31.5 years | 37.0 years |
Median Income | $43,008 | $66,895 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 26% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Blakely vs Cedar rapids
- The population in Cedar rapids is higher at 136,429, compared to 5,238 in Blakely.
- The median age in Cedar rapids is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 31.5 years in Blakely.
- Cedar rapids has a higher median income of $66,895, compared to $43,008 in Blakely.
- In Cedar rapids, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 27.0% in Blakely.
- Blakely has a higher poverty level at 26% compared to 10% in Cedar rapids.
- Cedar rapids has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.7% in Blakely.
Demographics
Demographics Blakely vs Cedar rapids provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Blakely | Cedar rapids |
---|---|---|
Black | 77 | 9 |
White | 22 | 78 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 4 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Blakely vs Cedar rapids
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Blakely at 77% compared to 9% in Cedar rapids.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar rapids at 78% compared to 22% in Blakely.
- In Cedar rapids, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Blakely.
- Cedar rapids has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Blakely.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cedar rapids at 6%, compared to 1% in Blakely.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Blakely and Cedar rapids at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Blakely | Cedar rapids |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 15.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 9.6% |
Depression | 21.3% | 21.3% |
Smoking | 23.4% | 16.9% |
Binge Drinking | 12.4% | 22.1% |
Obesity | 44.6% | 39.4% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Blakely vs Cedar rapids
- More residents in Blakely report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 15.5% in Cedar rapids.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 21.3%.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Blakely at 23.4% compared to 16.9% in Cedar rapids.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar rapids at 22.1% compared to 12.4% in Blakely.
- Obesity rates are higher in Blakely at 44.6% compared to 39.4% in Cedar rapids.
- Disability percentages are higher in Blakely at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar rapids.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Blakely | Cedar rapids |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (35) | 0.6% (803) |
High School Diploma | 18.8% (985) | 14.9% (20,356) |
Less than High School | 14.5% (759) | 6.9% (9,473) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.1% (320) | 22.3% (30,460) |
Education Levels Comparison: Blakely vs Cedar rapids
- A higher percentage of residents in Blakely have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Cedar rapids.
- A higher percentage of residents in Blakely hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 14.9% in Cedar rapids.
- More residents in Blakely have less than a high school education at 14.5% compared to 6.9% in Cedar rapids.
- In Cedar rapids, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 6.1% in Blakely.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.