Demographics details for Blair, SC vs Grinnell, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Blair, SC vs Grinnell, KS.
| Data | Blair | Grinnell |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 250 | 254 |
| Median Age | 35.0 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $55,000 | $56,042 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 58.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Blair vs Grinnell
- The population in Grinnell is higher at 254, compared to 250 in Blair.
- The median age in Grinnell is higher at 37.9 years, compared to 35.0 years in Blair.
- Grinnell has a higher median income of $56,042, compared to $55,000 in Blair.
- In Grinnell, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 30.0% in Blair.
- The poverty level is identical in both Blair and Grinnell at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Blair is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Grinnell.
Demographics
Demographics Blair vs Grinnell provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Blair | Grinnell |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 20 | Data is updating |
| White | 70 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Blair vs Grinnell
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Blair at 20% compared to 0% in Grinnell.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grinnell at 100% compared to 70% in Blair.
- Both Blair and Grinnell have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Blair at 5% compared to 0% in Grinnell.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Blair at 5% compared to 0% in Grinnell.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Blair and Grinnell at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Blair | Grinnell |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 9.6% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 20.4% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 38.3% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Blair vs Grinnell
- In Grinnell, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 0.0% in Blair.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grinnell at 20.1% versus 0.0% in Blair.
- Grinnell has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Blair.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grinnell at 20.4% compared to 0.0% in Blair.
- Grinnell has higher obesity rates at 38.3% compared to 0.0% in Blair.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grinnell at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Blair.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Blair | Grinnell |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 18.9% (48) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 16.5% (42) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 16.9% (43) |
Education Levels Comparison: Blair vs Grinnell
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Blair and Grinnell at 0.0%.
- In Grinnell, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.9% compared to 0.0% in Blair.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grinnell at 16.5%, compared to 0.0% in Blair.
- In Grinnell, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Blair.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.