Demographics details for Blackfoot, ID vs Tehachapi, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Blackfoot, ID vs Tehachapi, CA.
| Data | Blackfoot | Tehachapi |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,702 | 12,389 |
| Median Age | 34.4 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $57,951 | $62,788 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Blackfoot vs Tehachapi
- In Blackfoot, the population is higher at 12,702, compared to 12,389 in Tehachapi.
- The median age in Tehachapi is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 34.4 years in Blackfoot.
- Tehachapi has a higher median income of $62,788, compared to $57,951 in Blackfoot.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Blackfoot at 36.0% compared to 32.0% in Tehachapi.
- Blackfoot has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 11% in Tehachapi.
- Tehachapi has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 3.5% in Blackfoot.
Demographics
Demographics Blackfoot vs Tehachapi provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Blackfoot | Tehachapi |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 7 |
| White | 71 | 37 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 37 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 12 |
| American Indian | 4 | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Blackfoot vs Tehachapi
- In Tehachapi, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 0% in Blackfoot.
- Blackfoot has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 37% in Tehachapi.
- In Tehachapi, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Blackfoot.
- Tehachapi has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 18% in Blackfoot.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tehachapi at 12%, compared to 7% in Blackfoot.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Blackfoot and Tehachapi at 4%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Blackfoot | Tehachapi |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 15.8% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 36.0% | 35.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Blackfoot vs Tehachapi
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Blackfoot and Tehachapi at 16.0%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Blackfoot at 24.0% compared to 17.6% in Tehachapi.
- Tehachapi has a higher smoking rate at 16.4% compared to 15.8% in Blackfoot.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Tehachapi at 18.7% compared to 14.3% in Blackfoot.
- Obesity rates are higher in Blackfoot at 36.0% compared to 35.2% in Tehachapi.
- Disability percentages are higher in Blackfoot at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Tehachapi.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Blackfoot | Tehachapi |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (16) | 1.4% (172) |
| High School Diploma | 15.5% (1,974) | 13.3% (1,649) |
| Less than High School | 13.2% (1,678) | 27.7% (3,437) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.6% (1,726) | 10.9% (1,354) |
Education Levels Comparison: Blackfoot vs Tehachapi
- In Tehachapi, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.1% in Blackfoot.
- A higher percentage of residents in Blackfoot hold a high school diploma at 15.5% compared to 13.3% in Tehachapi.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tehachapi at 27.7%, compared to 13.2% in Blackfoot.
- A higher percentage of residents in Blackfoot hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.6% compared to 10.9% in Tehachapi.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.