Demographics details for Bixby, OK vs West richland, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bixby, OK vs West richland, WA.
| Data | Bixby | West richland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,800 | 17,795 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $93,765 | $118,093 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Bixby vs West richland
- In Bixby, the population is higher at 29,800, compared to 17,795 in West richland.
- Residents in Bixby have a higher median age of 36.8 years compared to 35.3 years in West richland.
- West richland has a higher median income of $118,093, compared to $93,765 in Bixby.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bixby at 44.0% compared to 40.0% in West richland.
- The poverty level is higher in West richland at 7%, compared to 5% in Bixby.
- West richland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.3% in Bixby.
Demographics
Demographics Bixby vs West richland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bixby | West richland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 71 | 70 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 14 |
| American Indian | 5 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bixby vs West richland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bixby at 2% compared to 1% in West richland.
- Bixby has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 70% in West richland.
- The Asian population is larger in Bixby at 4% compared to 1% in West richland.
- West richland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 7% in Bixby.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in West richland at 14%, compared to 11% in Bixby.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bixby at 5% compared to 0% in West richland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bixby | West richland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 24.5% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 12.8% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 32.1% | 30.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bixby vs West richland
- More residents in Bixby report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 15.5% in West richland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in West richland at 25.4% versus 24.5% in Bixby.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bixby at 12.8% compared to 11.5% in West richland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in West richland at 19.1% compared to 15.7% in Bixby.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bixby at 32.1% compared to 30.2% in West richland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in West richland at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Bixby.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bixby | West richland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (154) | 0.2% (28) |
| High School Diploma | 10.8% (3,233) | 8.9% (1,580) |
| Less than High School | 5.5% (1,652) | 7.2% (1,287) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.9% (8,313) | 22.5% (4,000) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bixby vs West richland
- A higher percentage of residents in Bixby have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.2% in West richland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bixby hold a high school diploma at 10.8% compared to 8.9% in West richland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in West richland at 7.2%, compared to 5.5% in Bixby.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bixby hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.9% compared to 22.5% in West richland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.