Demographics details for Bison, KS vs West richland, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bison, KS vs West richland, WA.
| Data | Bison | West richland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 175 | 17,795 |
| Median Age | 47.8 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $61,875 | $118,093 |
| Married Families | 54.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Bison vs West richland
- The population in West richland is higher at 17,795, compared to 175 in Bison.
- Residents in Bison have a higher median age of 47.8 years compared to 35.3 years in West richland.
- West richland has a higher median income of $118,093, compared to $61,875 in Bison.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bison at 54.0% compared to 40.0% in West richland.
- Bison has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 7% in West richland.
- The unemployment rate in Bison is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.0% in West richland.
Demographics
Demographics Bison vs West richland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bison | West richland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 71 | 70 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bison vs West richland
- In West richland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Bison.
- Bison has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 70% in West richland.
- In West richland, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Bison.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bison at 17% compared to 14% in West richland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in West richland at 14%, compared to 12% in Bison.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bison and West richland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bison | West richland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 16.9% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 39.3% | 30.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bison vs West richland
- More residents in Bison report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 15.5% in West richland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in West richland at 25.4% versus 21.0% in Bison.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bison at 16.9% compared to 11.5% in West richland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bison at 19.6% compared to 19.1% in West richland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bison at 39.3% compared to 30.2% in West richland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bison at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in West richland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bison | West richland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (1) | 0.2% (28) |
| High School Diploma | 21.1% (37) | 8.9% (1,580) |
| Less than High School | 2.3% (4) | 7.2% (1,287) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.3% (25) | 22.5% (4,000) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bison vs West richland
- A higher percentage of residents in Bison have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in West richland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bison hold a high school diploma at 21.1% compared to 8.9% in West richland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in West richland at 7.2%, compared to 2.3% in Bison.
- In West richland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 14.3% in Bison.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.