Demographics details for Bison, KS vs Warner robins, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bison, KS vs Warner robins, GA.
| Data | Bison | Warner robins |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 175 | 82,175 |
| Median Age | 47.8 years | 32.4 years |
| Median Income | $61,875 | $63,678 |
| Married Families | 54.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Bison vs Warner robins
- The population in Warner robins is higher at 82,175, compared to 175 in Bison.
- Residents in Bison have a higher median age of 47.8 years compared to 32.4 years in Warner robins.
- Warner robins has a higher median income of $63,678, compared to $61,875 in Bison.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bison at 54.0% compared to 32.0% in Warner robins.
- Bison has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Warner robins.
- The unemployment rate in Bison is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.8% in Warner robins.
Demographics
Demographics Bison vs Warner robins provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bison | Warner robins |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 40 |
| White | 71 | 42 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Bison vs Warner robins
- In Warner robins, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 0% in Bison.
- Bison has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 42% in Warner robins.
- In Warner robins, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Bison.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bison at 17% compared to 7% in Warner robins.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bison at 12% compared to 7% in Warner robins.
- In Warner robins, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Bison.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bison | Warner robins |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 16.9% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 39.3% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bison vs Warner robins
- In Warner robins, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.8% in Bison.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Warner robins at 22.1% versus 21.0% in Bison.
- Warner robins has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 16.9% in Bison.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bison at 19.6% compared to 15.9% in Warner robins.
- Warner robins has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 39.3% in Bison.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bison at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Warner robins.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bison | Warner robins |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (1) | 0.4% (335) |
| High School Diploma | 21.1% (37) | 14.9% (12,260) |
| Less than High School | 2.3% (4) | 7.0% (5,714) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.3% (25) | 19.2% (15,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bison vs Warner robins
- A higher percentage of residents in Bison have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Warner robins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bison hold a high school diploma at 21.1% compared to 14.9% in Warner robins.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Warner robins at 7.0%, compared to 2.3% in Bison.
- In Warner robins, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.2% compared to 14.3% in Bison.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.