Demographics details for Birmingham, AL vs Mcpherson, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Birmingham, AL vs Mcpherson, KS.
| Data | Birmingham | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 196,910 | 13,865 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 36.2 years |
| Median Income | $42,464 | $69,807 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Birmingham vs Mcpherson
- In Birmingham, the population is higher at 196,910, compared to 13,865 in Mcpherson.
- The median age in Mcpherson is higher at 36.2 years, compared to 35.9 years in Birmingham.
- Mcpherson has a higher median income of $69,807, compared to $42,464 in Birmingham.
- In Mcpherson, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 23.0% in Birmingham.
- Birmingham has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 9% in Mcpherson.
- The unemployment rate in Birmingham is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.3% in Mcpherson.
Demographics
Demographics Birmingham vs Mcpherson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Birmingham | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 70 | 2 |
| White | 21 | 87 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Birmingham vs Mcpherson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Birmingham at 70% compared to 2% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mcpherson at 87% compared to 21% in Birmingham.
- The Asian population is larger in Birmingham at 2% compared to 1% in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 4% in Birmingham.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mcpherson at 4%, compared to 3% in Birmingham.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Birmingham and Mcpherson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Birmingham | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 21.1% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.7% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 45.7% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Birmingham vs Mcpherson
- More residents in Birmingham report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 15.2% in Mcpherson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Birmingham at 21.2% compared to 20.1% in Mcpherson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Birmingham at 21.1% compared to 17.6% in Mcpherson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mcpherson at 18.2% compared to 12.7% in Birmingham.
- Obesity rates are higher in Birmingham at 45.7% compared to 36.6% in Mcpherson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Birmingham at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Mcpherson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Birmingham | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (1,793) | 0.3% (48) |
| High School Diploma | 17.5% (34,520) | 12.8% (1,775) |
| Less than High School | 10.1% (19,856) | 5.8% (804) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.6% (40,596) | 21.7% (3,010) |
Education Levels Comparison: Birmingham vs Mcpherson
- A higher percentage of residents in Birmingham have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.3% in Mcpherson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Birmingham hold a high school diploma at 17.5% compared to 12.8% in Mcpherson.
- More residents in Birmingham have less than a high school education at 10.1% compared to 5.8% in Mcpherson.
- In Mcpherson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 20.6% in Birmingham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.