Demographics details for Birmingham, AL vs Kings mountain, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Birmingham, AL vs Kings mountain, NC.
| Data | Birmingham | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 196,910 | 11,638 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $42,464 | $45,301 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Birmingham vs Kings mountain
- In Birmingham, the population is higher at 196,910, compared to 11,638 in Kings mountain.
- The median age in Kings mountain is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 35.9 years in Birmingham.
- Kings mountain has a higher median income of $45,301, compared to $42,464 in Birmingham.
- In Kings mountain, the percentage of married families is higher at 24.0%, compared to 23.0% in Birmingham.
- Birmingham has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 11% in Kings mountain.
- Kings mountain has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.6% in Birmingham.
Demographics
Demographics Birmingham vs Kings mountain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Birmingham | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 70 | 25 |
| White | 21 | 68 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Birmingham vs Kings mountain
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Birmingham at 70% compared to 25% in Kings mountain.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kings mountain at 68% compared to 21% in Birmingham.
- Both Birmingham and Kings mountain have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Birmingham at 4% compared to 2% in Kings mountain.
- Both Birmingham and Kings mountain have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Birmingham and Kings mountain at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Birmingham | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 21.1% | 20.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.7% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 45.7% | 38.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Birmingham vs Kings mountain
- More residents in Birmingham report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 18.3% in Kings mountain.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kings mountain at 25.7% versus 21.2% in Birmingham.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Birmingham at 21.1% compared to 20.9% in Kings mountain.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kings mountain at 16.3% compared to 12.7% in Birmingham.
- Obesity rates are higher in Birmingham at 45.7% compared to 38.0% in Kings mountain.
- Disability percentages are higher in Birmingham at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Kings mountain.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Birmingham | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (1,793) | 0.4% (43) |
| High School Diploma | 17.5% (34,520) | 21.7% (2,528) |
| Less than High School | 10.1% (19,856) | 17.8% (2,071) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.6% (40,596) | 11.6% (1,353) |
Education Levels Comparison: Birmingham vs Kings mountain
- A higher percentage of residents in Birmingham have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Kings mountain.
- In Kings mountain, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 17.5% in Birmingham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kings mountain at 17.8%, compared to 10.1% in Birmingham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Birmingham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.6% compared to 11.6% in Kings mountain.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.