Demographics details for Birmingham, AL vs Gallatin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Birmingham, AL vs Gallatin, TN.
| Data | Birmingham | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 196,910 | 48,194 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $42,464 | $68,548 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Birmingham vs Gallatin
- In Birmingham, the population is higher at 196,910, compared to 48,194 in Gallatin.
- The median age in Gallatin is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 35.9 years in Birmingham.
- Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548, compared to $42,464 in Birmingham.
- In Gallatin, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 23.0% in Birmingham.
- Birmingham has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 13% in Gallatin.
- The unemployment rate in Birmingham is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Birmingham vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Birmingham | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 70 | 15 |
| White | 21 | 67 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Birmingham vs Gallatin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Birmingham at 70% compared to 15% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gallatin at 67% compared to 21% in Birmingham.
- Both Birmingham and Gallatin have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Gallatin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 4% in Birmingham.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gallatin at 7%, compared to 3% in Birmingham.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Birmingham and Gallatin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Birmingham | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 27.7% |
| Smoking | 21.1% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.7% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 45.7% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Birmingham vs Gallatin
- More residents in Birmingham report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 19.0% in Gallatin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gallatin at 27.7% versus 21.2% in Birmingham.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Birmingham at 21.1% compared to 20.8% in Gallatin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gallatin at 14.7% compared to 12.7% in Birmingham.
- Obesity rates are higher in Birmingham at 45.7% compared to 37.2% in Gallatin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Birmingham at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Gallatin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Birmingham | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (1,793) | 1.2% (596) |
| High School Diploma | 17.5% (34,520) | 13.9% (6,695) |
| Less than High School | 10.1% (19,856) | 11.6% (5,600) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.6% (40,596) | 19.6% (9,464) |
Education Levels Comparison: Birmingham vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.9% in Birmingham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Birmingham hold a high school diploma at 17.5% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gallatin at 11.6%, compared to 10.1% in Birmingham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Birmingham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.6% compared to 19.6% in Gallatin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.