Demographics details for Binford, ND vs Shasta lake, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Binford, ND vs Shasta lake, CA.
Data | Binford | Shasta lake |
---|---|---|
Population | 163 | 10,335 |
Median Age | 42.5 years | 38.8 years |
Median Income | $46,250 | $54,490 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Binford vs Shasta lake
- The population in Shasta lake is higher at 10,335, compared to 163 in Binford.
- Residents in Binford have a higher median age of 42.5 years compared to 38.8 years in Shasta lake.
- Shasta lake has a higher median income of $54,490, compared to $46,250 in Binford.
- In Shasta lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 33.0% in Binford.
- The poverty level is higher in Shasta lake at 12%, compared to 10% in Binford.
- Shasta lake has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 2.5% in Binford.
Demographics
Demographics Binford vs Shasta lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Binford | Shasta lake |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 94 | 74 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 6 | 12 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Binford vs Shasta lake
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Binford and Shasta lake at 0%.
- Binford has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 74% in Shasta lake.
- In Shasta lake, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Binford.
- Shasta lake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 6% in Binford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shasta lake at 11%, compared to 0% in Binford.
- In Shasta lake, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Binford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Binford | Shasta lake |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | 19.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 13.2% |
Depression | 20.1% | 22.9% |
Smoking | 17.0% | 17.4% |
Binge Drinking | 21.9% | 17.5% |
Obesity | 40.0% | 32.5% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Binford vs Shasta lake
- In Shasta lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 14.3% in Binford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Shasta lake at 22.9% versus 20.1% in Binford.
- Shasta lake has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 17.0% in Binford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Binford at 21.9% compared to 17.5% in Shasta lake.
- Obesity rates are higher in Binford at 40.0% compared to 32.5% in Shasta lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shasta lake at 25.0% compared to 10.0% in Binford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Binford | Shasta lake |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (67) |
High School Diploma | 23.9% (39) | 17.0% (1,759) |
Less than High School | 11.0% (18) | 11.4% (1,176) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (28) | 9.2% (946) |
Education Levels Comparison: Binford vs Shasta lake
- In Shasta lake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Binford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Binford hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 17.0% in Shasta lake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shasta lake at 11.4%, compared to 11.0% in Binford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Binford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 9.2% in Shasta lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.