Demographics details for Binford, ND vs Rancho cucamonga, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Binford, ND vs Rancho cucamonga, CA.

Data Binford Rancho cucamonga
Population 163 176,336
Median Age 42.5 years 37.5 years
Median Income $46,250 $105,534
Married Families 33.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 10% 11%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 3.8

Population Comparison: Binford vs Rancho cucamonga

  • The population in Rancho cucamonga is higher at 176,336, compared to 163 in Binford.
  • Residents in Binford have a higher median age of 42.5 years compared to 37.5 years in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Rancho cucamonga has a higher median income of $105,534, compared to $46,250 in Binford.
  • In Rancho cucamonga, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 33.0% in Binford.
  • The poverty level is higher in Rancho cucamonga at 11%, compared to 10% in Binford.
  • Rancho cucamonga has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 2.5% in Binford.

Demographics

Demographics Binford vs Rancho cucamonga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Binford Rancho cucamonga
Black Data is updating 9
White 94 22
Asian Data is updating 14
Hispanic 6 39
Two or More Races Data is updating 15
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Binford vs Rancho cucamonga

  • In Rancho cucamonga, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Binford.
  • Binford has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 22% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • In Rancho cucamonga, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 0% in Binford.
  • Rancho cucamonga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 6% in Binford.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rancho cucamonga at 15%, compared to 0% in Binford.
  • In Rancho cucamonga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Binford.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Binford Rancho cucamonga
Mental Health Not Good 14.3% 14.8%
Physical Health Not Good 9.8% 9.8%
Depression 20.1% 17.2%
Smoking 17.0% 10.0%
Binge Drinking 21.9% 16.6%
Obesity 40.0% 33.9%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Binford vs Rancho cucamonga

  • In Rancho cucamonga, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.8% compared to 14.3% in Binford.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Binford at 20.1% compared to 17.2% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Binford at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Binford at 21.9% compared to 16.6% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Binford at 40.0% compared to 33.9% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Binford at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Rancho cucamonga.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Binford Rancho cucamonga
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.2% (2,052)
High School Diploma 23.9% (39) 11.7% (20,590)
Less than High School 11.0% (18) 10.0% (17,566)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.2% (28) 25.3% (44,534)

Education Levels Comparison: Binford vs Rancho cucamonga

  • In Rancho cucamonga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Binford.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Binford hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 11.7% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • More residents in Binford have less than a high school education at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • In Rancho cucamonga, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.3% compared to 17.2% in Binford.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.