Demographics details for Binford, ND vs Lexington, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Binford, ND vs Lexington, NE.
| Data | Binford | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163 | 10,725 |
| Median Age | 42.5 years | 30.0 years |
| Median Income | $46,250 | $63,939 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Binford vs Lexington
- The population in Lexington is higher at 10,725, compared to 163 in Binford.
- Residents in Binford have a higher median age of 42.5 years compared to 30.0 years in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher median income of $63,939, compared to $46,250 in Binford.
- In Lexington, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 33.0% in Binford.
- Binford has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Binford.
Demographics
Demographics Binford vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Binford | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 15 |
| White | 94 | 4 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 64 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Binford vs Lexington
- In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 0% in Binford.
- Binford has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 4% in Lexington.
- In Lexington, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Binford.
- Lexington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 64%, compared to 6% in Binford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lexington at 15%, compared to 0% in Binford.
- In Lexington, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Binford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Binford | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | 13.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 16.2% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.9% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 45.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Binford vs Lexington
- More residents in Binford report poor mental health at 14.3% compared to 13.6% in Lexington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Binford at 20.1% compared to 16.2% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 17.0% in Binford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Binford at 21.9% compared to 18.1% in Lexington.
- Lexington has higher obesity rates at 45.1% compared to 40.0% in Binford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Binford at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Lexington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Binford | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 6.2% (660) |
| High School Diploma | 23.9% (39) | 13.6% (1,463) |
| Less than High School | 11.0% (18) | 36.3% (3,892) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (28) | 7.3% (779) |
Education Levels Comparison: Binford vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 0.0% in Binford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Binford hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 13.6% in Lexington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 36.3%, compared to 11.0% in Binford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Binford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 7.3% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.