Demographics details for Binford, ND vs Claremont, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Binford, ND vs Claremont, CA.
| Data | Binford | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163 | 36,001 |
| Median Age | 42.5 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $46,250 | $115,091 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Binford vs Claremont
- The population in Claremont is higher at 36,001, compared to 163 in Binford.
- Residents in Binford have a higher median age of 42.5 years compared to 41.5 years in Claremont.
- Claremont has a higher median income of $115,091, compared to $46,250 in Binford.
- In Claremont, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 33.0% in Binford.
- Binford has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Claremont.
- Claremont has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 2.5% in Binford.
Demographics
Demographics Binford vs Claremont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Binford | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 6 |
| White | 94 | 37 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 16 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Binford vs Claremont
- In Claremont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Binford.
- Binford has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 37% in Claremont.
- In Claremont, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 0% in Binford.
- Claremont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 6% in Binford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Claremont at 16%, compared to 0% in Binford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Binford and Claremont at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Binford | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | 14.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 16.3% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 8.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.9% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 24.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Binford vs Claremont
- More residents in Binford report poor mental health at 14.3% compared to 14.0% in Claremont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Binford at 20.1% compared to 16.3% in Claremont.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Binford at 17.0% compared to 8.2% in Claremont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Binford at 21.9% compared to 16.7% in Claremont.
- Obesity rates are higher in Binford at 40.0% compared to 24.5% in Claremont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Claremont at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Binford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Binford | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.1% (403) |
| High School Diploma | 23.9% (39) | 6.7% (2,427) |
| Less than High School | 11.0% (18) | 6.2% (2,248) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (28) | 39.5% (14,204) |
Education Levels Comparison: Binford vs Claremont
- In Claremont, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Binford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Binford hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 6.7% in Claremont.
- More residents in Binford have less than a high school education at 11.0% compared to 6.2% in Claremont.
- In Claremont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.5% compared to 17.2% in Binford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.