Demographics details for Biloxi, MS vs Scandia, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Biloxi, MS vs Scandia, KS.
| Data | Biloxi | Scandia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 49,118 | 338 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 48.6 years |
| Median Income | $55,775 | $49,219 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Biloxi vs Scandia
- In Biloxi, the population is higher at 49,118, compared to 338 in Scandia.
- The median age in Scandia is higher at 48.6 years, compared to 36.7 years in Biloxi.
- Biloxi has a higher median income of $55,775 compared to $49,219 in Scandia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Biloxi at 39.0% compared to 34.0% in Scandia.
- Biloxi has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 15% in Scandia.
- Scandia has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 3.3% in Biloxi.
Demographics
Demographics Biloxi vs Scandia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Biloxi | Scandia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 21 | 1 |
| White | 59 | 90 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Biloxi vs Scandia
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Biloxi at 21% compared to 1% in Scandia.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Scandia at 90% compared to 59% in Biloxi.
- The Asian population is larger in Biloxi at 4% compared to 0% in Scandia.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Biloxi at 9% compared to 0% in Scandia.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Scandia at 9%, compared to 7% in Biloxi.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Biloxi and Scandia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Biloxi | Scandia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 20.9% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 16.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 20.3% |
| Obesity | 34.8% | 37.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Biloxi vs Scandia
- More residents in Biloxi report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.7% in Scandia.
- Depression is more prevalent in Biloxi at 22.0% compared to 20.9% in Scandia.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Biloxi at 20.0% compared to 16.9% in Scandia.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Scandia at 20.3% compared to 15.3% in Biloxi.
- Scandia has higher obesity rates at 37.5% compared to 34.8% in Biloxi.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Scandia at 21.0% compared to 15.0% in Biloxi.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Biloxi | Scandia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (601) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (5,955) | 14.5% (49) |
| Less than High School | 13.0% (6,371) | 10.7% (36) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.7% (9,654) | 18.6% (63) |
Education Levels Comparison: Biloxi vs Scandia
- A higher percentage of residents in Biloxi have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Scandia.
- In Scandia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.5% compared to 12.1% in Biloxi.
- More residents in Biloxi have less than a high school education at 13.0% compared to 10.7% in Scandia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Biloxi hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.7% compared to 18.6% in Scandia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.