Demographics details for Biloxi, MS vs Navajo dam, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Biloxi, MS vs Navajo dam, NM.
| Data | Biloxi | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 49,118 | 330 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $55,775 | $63,375 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Biloxi vs Navajo dam
- In Biloxi, the population is higher at 49,118, compared to 330 in Navajo dam.
- Residents in Biloxi have a higher median age of 36.7 years compared to 36.6 years in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has a higher median income of $63,375, compared to $55,775 in Biloxi.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Biloxi at 39.0% compared to 34.0% in Navajo dam.
- Biloxi has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 14% in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.3% in Biloxi.
Demographics
Demographics Biloxi vs Navajo dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Biloxi | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 21 | Data is updating |
| White | 59 | 16 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 67 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 6 |
Demographics Comparison: Biloxi vs Navajo dam
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Biloxi at 21% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- Biloxi has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 16% in Navajo dam.
- The Asian population is larger in Biloxi at 4% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 67%, compared to 9% in Biloxi.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Navajo dam at 11%, compared to 7% in Biloxi.
- In Navajo dam, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 6%, compared to 0% in Biloxi.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Biloxi | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 34.8% | 32.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Biloxi vs Navajo dam
- More residents in Biloxi report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.2% in Navajo dam.
- Depression is more prevalent in Biloxi at 22.0% compared to 17.8% in Navajo dam.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Biloxi at 20.0% compared to 15.0% in Navajo dam.
- Binge drinking is more common in Biloxi at 15.3% compared to 14.1% in Navajo dam.
- Obesity rates are higher in Biloxi at 34.8% compared to 32.6% in Navajo dam.
- Disability percentages are higher in Biloxi at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Navajo dam.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Biloxi | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (601) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (5,955) | 4.8% (16) |
| Less than High School | 13.0% (6,371) | 6.1% (20) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.7% (9,654) | 22.7% (75) |
Education Levels Comparison: Biloxi vs Navajo dam
- A higher percentage of residents in Biloxi have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Biloxi hold a high school diploma at 12.1% compared to 4.8% in Navajo dam.
- More residents in Biloxi have less than a high school education at 13.0% compared to 6.1% in Navajo dam.
- In Navajo dam, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 19.7% in Biloxi.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.