Demographics details for Billings, MT vs Logsden, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Billings, MT vs Logsden, OR.
Data | Billings | Logsden |
---|---|---|
Population | 119,960 | 12 |
Median Age | 37.7 years | 45.0 years |
Median Income | $69,692 | $50,000 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 6.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Billings vs Logsden
- In Billings, the population is higher at 119,960, compared to 12 in Logsden.
- The median age in Logsden is higher at 45.0 years, compared to 37.7 years in Billings.
- Billings has a higher median income of $69,692 compared to $50,000 in Logsden.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Billings at 37.0% compared to 6.0% in Logsden.
- The poverty level is identical in both Billings and Logsden at 10%.
- Logsden has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Billings.
Demographics
Demographics Billings vs Logsden provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Billings | Logsden |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 82 | 90 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Billings vs Logsden
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Billings at 1% compared to 0% in Logsden.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Logsden at 90% compared to 82% in Billings.
- The Asian population is larger in Billings at 1% compared to 0% in Logsden.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Billings at 7% compared to 5% in Logsden.
- Both Billings and Logsden have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Billings at 4% compared to 0% in Logsden.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Billings | Logsden |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 27.8% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 16.1% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 22.9% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 32.9% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Billings vs Logsden
- More residents in Billings report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 0.0% in Logsden.
- Depression is more prevalent in Billings at 27.8% compared to 0.0% in Logsden.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Billings at 16.1% compared to 0.0% in Logsden.
- Binge drinking is more common in Billings at 22.9% compared to 0.0% in Logsden.
- Obesity rates are higher in Billings at 32.9% compared to 0.0% in Logsden.
- Disability percentages are higher in Billings at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Logsden.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Billings | Logsden |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (321) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 14.7% (17,691) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 5.4% (6,502) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.8% (29,705) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Billings vs Logsden
- A higher percentage of residents in Billings have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Logsden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Billings hold a high school diploma at 14.7% compared to 0.0% in Logsden.
- More residents in Billings have less than a high school education at 5.4% compared to 0.0% in Logsden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Billings hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.8% compared to 0.0% in Logsden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.