Demographics details for Bigfork, MN vs Harvey, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bigfork, MN vs Harvey, IA.
| Data | Bigfork | Harvey |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 403 | 236 |
| Median Age | 66.3 years | 47.5 years |
| Median Income | $33,750 | $50,313 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Bigfork vs Harvey
- In Bigfork, the population is higher at 403, compared to 236 in Harvey.
- Residents in Bigfork have a higher median age of 66.3 years compared to 47.5 years in Harvey.
- Harvey has a higher median income of $50,313, compared to $33,750 in Bigfork.
- In Harvey, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 31.0% in Bigfork.
- Bigfork has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Harvey.
- The unemployment rate in Bigfork is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.0% in Harvey.
Demographics
Demographics Bigfork vs Harvey provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bigfork | Harvey |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 93 | 97 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 1 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bigfork vs Harvey
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bigfork at 1% compared to 0% in Harvey.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Harvey at 97% compared to 93% in Bigfork.
- In Harvey, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Bigfork.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bigfork at 2% compared to 0% in Harvey.
- Both Bigfork and Harvey have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 1%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bigfork at 3% compared to 0% in Harvey.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bigfork | Harvey |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 15.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 18.9% |
| Smoking | 21.9% | 17.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 22.8% |
| Obesity | 41.6% | 37.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bigfork vs Harvey
- More residents in Bigfork report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 15.3% in Harvey.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bigfork at 24.3% compared to 18.9% in Harvey.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bigfork at 21.9% compared to 17.8% in Harvey.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Harvey at 22.8% compared to 18.4% in Bigfork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bigfork at 41.6% compared to 37.5% in Harvey.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bigfork at 23.0% compared to 14.0% in Harvey.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bigfork | Harvey |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 26.6% (107) | 26.7% (63) |
| Less than High School | 9.7% (39) | 16.9% (40) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.2% (33) | 8.1% (19) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bigfork vs Harvey
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Bigfork and Harvey at 0.0%.
- In Harvey, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.7% compared to 26.6% in Bigfork.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Harvey at 16.9%, compared to 9.7% in Bigfork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bigfork hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.2% compared to 8.1% in Harvey.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.