Demographics details for Bigfork, MN vs Bessemer, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bigfork, MN vs Bessemer, AL.
| Data | Bigfork | Bessemer |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 403 | 25,264 |
| Median Age | 66.3 years | 41.8 years |
| Median Income | $33,750 | $34,953 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 22.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 26% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Bigfork vs Bessemer
- The population in Bessemer is higher at 25,264, compared to 403 in Bigfork.
- Residents in Bigfork have a higher median age of 66.3 years compared to 41.8 years in Bessemer.
- Bessemer has a higher median income of $34,953, compared to $33,750 in Bigfork.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bigfork at 31.0% compared to 22.0% in Bessemer.
- The poverty level is higher in Bessemer at 26%, compared to 9% in Bigfork.
- Bessemer has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Bigfork.
Demographics
Demographics Bigfork vs Bessemer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bigfork | Bessemer |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 74 |
| White | 93 | 15 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 4 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bigfork vs Bessemer
- In Bessemer, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 74% compared to 1% in Bigfork.
- Bigfork has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 15% in Bessemer.
- Both Bigfork and Bessemer have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Bessemer has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Bigfork.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bessemer at 4%, compared to 1% in Bigfork.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bigfork at 3% compared to 0% in Bessemer.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bigfork | Bessemer |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 20.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 21.7% |
| Smoking | 21.9% | 22.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 12.7% |
| Obesity | 41.6% | 45.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bigfork vs Bessemer
- In Bessemer, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 16.0% in Bigfork.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bigfork at 24.3% compared to 21.7% in Bessemer.
- Bessemer has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 21.9% in Bigfork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bigfork at 18.4% compared to 12.7% in Bessemer.
- Bessemer has higher obesity rates at 45.9% compared to 41.6% in Bigfork.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bessemer at 27.0% compared to 23.0% in Bigfork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bigfork | Bessemer |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.4% (363) |
| High School Diploma | 26.6% (107) | 24.9% (6,303) |
| Less than High School | 9.7% (39) | 13.3% (3,370) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.2% (33) | 9.7% (2,453) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bigfork vs Bessemer
- In Bessemer, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Bigfork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bigfork hold a high school diploma at 26.6% compared to 24.9% in Bessemer.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bessemer at 13.3%, compared to 9.7% in Bigfork.
- In Bessemer, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.7% compared to 8.2% in Bigfork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.