Demographics details for Big springs, NE vs South san francisco, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Big springs, NE vs South san francisco, CA.

Data Big springs South san francisco
Population 408 63,484
Median Age 53.5 years 42.3 years
Median Income $65,694 $127,062
Married Families 55.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 10% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.6

Population Comparison: Big springs vs South san francisco

  • The population in South san francisco is higher at 63,484, compared to 408 in Big springs.
  • Residents in Big springs have a higher median age of 53.5 years compared to 42.3 years in South san francisco.
  • South san francisco has a higher median income of $127,062, compared to $65,694 in Big springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Big springs at 55.0% compared to 44.0% in South san francisco.
  • Big springs has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in South san francisco.
  • South san francisco has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Big springs.

Demographics

Demographics Big springs vs South san francisco provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Big springs South san francisco
Black Data is updating 2
White 75 11
Asian Data is updating 45
Hispanic 15 30
Two or More Races 7 11
American Indian 3 1

Demographics Comparison: Big springs vs South san francisco

  • In South san francisco, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Big springs.
  • Big springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 11% in South san francisco.
  • In South san francisco, the Asian population stands at 45%, greater than 0% in Big springs.
  • South san francisco has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 15% in Big springs.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South san francisco at 11%, compared to 7% in Big springs.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Big springs at 3% compared to 1% in South san francisco.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Big springs South san francisco
Mental Health Not Good 14.4% 12.9%
Physical Health Not Good 9.9% 8.8%
Depression 17.8% 13.7%
Smoking 17.0% 9.3%
Binge Drinking 21.1% 14.5%
Obesity 39.5% 21.9%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Big springs vs South san francisco

  • More residents in Big springs report poor mental health at 14.4% compared to 12.9% in South san francisco.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Big springs at 17.8% compared to 13.7% in South san francisco.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Big springs at 17.0% compared to 9.3% in South san francisco.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Big springs at 21.1% compared to 14.5% in South san francisco.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Big springs at 39.5% compared to 21.9% in South san francisco.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Big springs at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in South san francisco.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Big springs South san francisco
No Schooling 0.7% (3) 2.5% (1,583)
High School Diploma 19.4% (79) 13.7% (8,667)
Less than High School 22.1% (90) 14.8% (9,368)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.7% (68) 30.4% (19,273)

Education Levels Comparison: Big springs vs South san francisco

  • In South san francisco, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.7% in Big springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Big springs hold a high school diploma at 19.4% compared to 13.7% in South san francisco.
  • More residents in Big springs have less than a high school education at 22.1% compared to 14.8% in South san francisco.
  • In South san francisco, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 16.7% in Big springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.