Demographics details for Big springs, NE vs Little falls, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Big springs, NE vs Little falls, MN.

Data Big springs Little falls
Population 408 9,094
Median Age 53.5 years 40.8 years
Median Income $65,694 $44,455
Married Families 55.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 10% 11%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.2

Population Comparison: Big springs vs Little falls

  • The population in Little falls is higher at 9,094, compared to 408 in Big springs.
  • Residents in Big springs have a higher median age of 53.5 years compared to 40.8 years in Little falls.
  • Big springs has a higher median income of $65,694 compared to $44,455 in Little falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Big springs at 55.0% compared to 34.0% in Little falls.
  • The poverty level is higher in Little falls at 11%, compared to 10% in Big springs.
  • Little falls has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Big springs.

Demographics

Demographics Big springs vs Little falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Big springs Little falls
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 75 95
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 15 1
Two or More Races 7 3
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Big springs vs Little falls

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Big springs and Little falls at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Little falls at 95% compared to 75% in Big springs.
  • In Little falls, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Big springs.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Big springs at 15% compared to 1% in Little falls.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Big springs at 7% compared to 3% in Little falls.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Big springs at 3% compared to 0% in Little falls.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Big springs Little falls
Mental Health Not Good 14.4% 16.6%
Physical Health Not Good 9.9% 10.9%
Depression 17.8% 25.0%
Smoking 17.0% 22.3%
Binge Drinking 21.1% 20.6%
Obesity 39.5% 38.5%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Big springs vs Little falls

  • In Little falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 14.4% in Big springs.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Little falls at 25.0% versus 17.8% in Big springs.
  • Little falls has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 17.0% in Big springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Big springs at 21.1% compared to 20.6% in Little falls.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Big springs at 39.5% compared to 38.5% in Little falls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Big springs at 18.0% compared to 17.0% in Little falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Big springs Little falls
No Schooling 0.7% (3) 0.7% (63)
High School Diploma 19.4% (79) 25.4% (2,308)
Less than High School 22.1% (90) 11.7% (1,063)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.7% (68) 14.3% (1,301)

Education Levels Comparison: Big springs vs Little falls

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Big springs and Little falls at 0.7%.
  • In Little falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.4% compared to 19.4% in Big springs.
  • More residents in Big springs have less than a high school education at 22.1% compared to 11.7% in Little falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Big springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.7% compared to 14.3% in Little falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.