Demographics details for Big springs, NE vs Island park, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Big springs, NE vs Island park, NY.
Data | Big springs | Island park |
---|---|---|
Population | 408 | 4,969 |
Median Age | 53.5 years | 42.7 years |
Median Income | $65,694 | $96,875 |
Married Families | 55.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Big springs vs Island park
- The population in Island park is higher at 4,969, compared to 408 in Big springs.
- Residents in Big springs have a higher median age of 53.5 years compared to 42.7 years in Island park.
- Island park has a higher median income of $96,875, compared to $65,694 in Big springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Big springs at 55.0% compared to 38.0% in Island park.
- Big springs has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Island park.
- Island park has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Big springs.
Demographics
Demographics Big springs vs Island park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Big springs | Island park |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 75 | 56 |
Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
Hispanic | 15 | 33 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Big springs vs Island park
- In Island park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Big springs.
- Big springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 56% in Island park.
- In Island park, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Big springs.
- Island park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 33%, compared to 15% in Big springs.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Big springs at 7% compared to 6% in Island park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Big springs at 3% compared to 0% in Island park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Big springs | Island park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 14.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 9.8% |
Depression | 17.8% | 17.4% |
Smoking | 17.0% | 14.1% |
Binge Drinking | 21.1% | 17.9% |
Obesity | 39.5% | 29.5% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Big springs vs Island park
- In Island park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.6% compared to 14.4% in Big springs.
- Depression is more prevalent in Big springs at 17.8% compared to 17.4% in Island park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Big springs at 17.0% compared to 14.1% in Island park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Big springs at 21.1% compared to 17.9% in Island park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Big springs at 39.5% compared to 29.5% in Island park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Big springs at 18.0% compared to 8.0% in Island park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Big springs | Island park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (3) | 0.5% (27) |
High School Diploma | 19.4% (79) | 27.9% (1,388) |
Less than High School | 22.1% (90) | 8.9% (443) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (68) | 16.5% (819) |
Education Levels Comparison: Big springs vs Island park
- A higher percentage of residents in Big springs have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Island park.
- In Island park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.9% compared to 19.4% in Big springs.
- More residents in Big springs have less than a high school education at 22.1% compared to 8.9% in Island park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Big springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.7% compared to 16.5% in Island park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.