Demographics details for Big springs, NE vs Irving, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Big springs, NE vs Irving, TX.
| Data | Big springs | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 408 | 254,715 |
| Median Age | 53.5 years | 32.4 years |
| Median Income | $65,694 | $76,686 |
| Married Families | 55.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Big springs vs Irving
- The population in Irving is higher at 254,715, compared to 408 in Big springs.
- Residents in Big springs have a higher median age of 53.5 years compared to 32.4 years in Irving.
- Irving has a higher median income of $76,686, compared to $65,694 in Big springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Big springs at 55.0% compared to 39.0% in Irving.
- The poverty level is higher in Irving at 12%, compared to 10% in Big springs.
- Irving has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.5% in Big springs.
Demographics
Demographics Big springs vs Irving provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Big springs | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 13 |
| White | 75 | 11 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 22 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 43 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 11 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Big springs vs Irving
- In Irving, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 0% in Big springs.
- Big springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 11% in Irving.
- In Irving, the Asian population stands at 22%, greater than 0% in Big springs.
- Irving has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 43%, compared to 15% in Big springs.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Irving at 11%, compared to 7% in Big springs.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Big springs at 3% compared to 0% in Irving.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Big springs | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 15.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.1% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 32.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Big springs vs Irving
- In Irving, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 14.4% in Big springs.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Irving at 21.0% versus 17.8% in Big springs.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Big springs at 17.0% compared to 15.4% in Irving.
- Binge drinking is more common in Big springs at 21.1% compared to 17.4% in Irving.
- Obesity rates are higher in Big springs at 39.5% compared to 32.4% in Irving.
- Disability percentages are higher in Big springs at 18.0% compared to 7.0% in Irving.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Big springs | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (3) | 1.8% (4,699) |
| High School Diploma | 19.4% (79) | 10.3% (26,322) |
| Less than High School | 22.1% (90) | 24.8% (63,108) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (68) | 26.1% (66,363) |
Education Levels Comparison: Big springs vs Irving
- In Irving, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.7% in Big springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Big springs hold a high school diploma at 19.4% compared to 10.3% in Irving.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Irving at 24.8%, compared to 22.1% in Big springs.
- In Irving, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 16.7% in Big springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.