Environment details: Big sky MT
Water quality acceptable, minimal pollution detected.
Environment details: Sacred heart MN
Low quality; significant pollution risks.
Compare Environment: Big sky MT vs Sacred heart MN
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
Metric | Big sky | Sacred heart |
---|---|---|
CO2 Emissions | 228 | 665 |
Water Quality | 6/10 | 3/10 |
Water Quality Explanation | Water quality acceptable, minimal pollution detected. | Low quality; significant pollution risks. |
Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Average Air Quality Index | 1.69 | 1.63 |
Worst AQI | 5.0 | 4.0 |
Days with Poor AQI | 17 | 17 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Big sky vs Sacred heart
- Water quality is rated higher in Big sky at 6/10 compared to 3/10 in Sacred heart.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Big sky with 1.69 compared to 1.63 in Sacred heart.
- Both cities report the same number of days with poor air quality at 17.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.