Demographics details for Big sky, MT vs Port arthur, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Big sky, MT vs Port arthur, TX.
Data | Big sky | Port arthur |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,825 | 55,579 |
Median Age | 37.2 years | 33.7 years |
Median Income | $94,176 | $45,357 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 23% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 11.0 |
Population Comparison: Big sky vs Port arthur
- The population in Port arthur is higher at 55,579, compared to 2,825 in Big sky.
- Residents in Big sky have a higher median age of 37.2 years compared to 33.7 years in Port arthur.
- Big sky has a higher median income of $94,176 compared to $45,357 in Port arthur.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Big sky at 43.0% compared to 30.0% in Port arthur.
- The poverty level is higher in Port arthur at 23%, compared to 5% in Big sky.
- Port arthur has a higher unemployment rate at 11.0% compared to 3.5% in Big sky.
Demographics
Demographics Big sky vs Port arthur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Big sky | Port arthur |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 43 |
White | 85 | 3 |
Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
Hispanic | 12 | 34 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 13 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Big sky vs Port arthur
- In Port arthur, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 43% compared to 0% in Big sky.
- Big sky has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 3% in Port arthur.
- In Port arthur, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Big sky.
- Port arthur has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 12% in Big sky.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port arthur at 13%, compared to 2% in Big sky.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Big sky and Port arthur at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Big sky | Port arthur |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.8% | 19.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 15.9% |
Depression | 20.6% | 20.4% |
Smoking | 10.7% | 23.3% |
Binge Drinking | 24.3% | 13.9% |
Obesity | 24.1% | 42.2% |
Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Big sky vs Port arthur
- In Port arthur, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 12.8% in Big sky.
- Depression is more prevalent in Big sky at 20.6% compared to 20.4% in Port arthur.
- Port arthur has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 10.7% in Big sky.
- Binge drinking is more common in Big sky at 24.3% compared to 13.9% in Port arthur.
- Port arthur has higher obesity rates at 42.2% compared to 24.1% in Big sky.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port arthur at 15.0% compared to 5.0% in Big sky.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Big sky | Port arthur |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.5% (1,383) |
High School Diploma | 10.1% (284) | 19.6% (10,902) |
Less than High School | 4.2% (118) | 23.7% (13,180) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 44.6% (1,261) | 7.1% (3,955) |
Education Levels Comparison: Big sky vs Port arthur
- In Port arthur, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.0% in Big sky.
- In Port arthur, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.6% compared to 10.1% in Big sky.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Port arthur at 23.7%, compared to 4.2% in Big sky.
- A higher percentage of residents in Big sky hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.6% compared to 7.1% in Port arthur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.