Environment details: Big sky MT
Water quality acceptable, minimal pollution detected.
Environment details: Oceanside CA
Average quality, needs continuous monitoring.
Compare Environment: Big sky MT vs Oceanside CA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Big sky | Oceanside |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 228 | 2592 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Water quality acceptable, minimal pollution detected. | Average quality, needs continuous monitoring. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.69 | 2.23 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 17 | 101 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Big sky vs Oceanside
- Water quality is rated higher in Big sky at 6/10 compared to 5/10 in Oceanside.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Oceanside with an average index of 2.23 compared to 1.69 in Big sky.
- Oceanside experiences more days with poor air quality at 101 compared to 17 in Big sky.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.