Environment details: Big sky MT
Water quality acceptable, minimal pollution detected.
Environment details: Kingston RI
Good quality; effective management.
Compare Environment: Big sky MT vs Kingston RI
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Big sky | Kingston |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 228 | 85 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Water quality acceptable, minimal pollution detected. | Good quality; effective management. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.69 | 1.89 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 17 | 52 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Big sky vs Kingston
- The water quality in Kingston is superior at 7/10 compared to 6/10 in Big sky.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Kingston with an average index of 1.89 compared to 1.69 in Big sky.
- Kingston experiences more days with poor air quality at 52 compared to 17 in Big sky.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.