Demographics details for Big sky, MT vs Grand island, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Big sky, MT vs Grand island, NE.
| Data | Big sky | Grand island |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,825 | 52,513 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $94,176 | $59,061 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Big sky vs Grand island
- The population in Grand island is higher at 52,513, compared to 2,825 in Big sky.
- Residents in Big sky have a higher median age of 37.2 years compared to 35.0 years in Grand island.
- Big sky has a higher median income of $94,176 compared to $59,061 in Grand island.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Big sky at 43.0% compared to 37.0% in Grand island.
- The poverty level is higher in Grand island at 10%, compared to 5% in Big sky.
- The unemployment rate in Big sky is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.1% in Grand island.
Demographics
Demographics Big sky vs Grand island provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Big sky | Grand island |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 85 | 52 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Big sky vs Grand island
- In Grand island, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Big sky.
- Big sky has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 52% in Grand island.
- In Grand island, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Big sky.
- Grand island has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 12% in Big sky.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grand island at 8%, compared to 2% in Big sky.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Big sky and Grand island at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Big sky | Grand island |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.8% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 20.6% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 10.7% | 16.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.3% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 24.1% | 41.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Big sky vs Grand island
- In Grand island, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.2% compared to 12.8% in Big sky.
- Depression is more prevalent in Big sky at 20.6% compared to 17.0% in Grand island.
- Grand island has a higher smoking rate at 16.8% compared to 10.7% in Big sky.
- Binge drinking is more common in Big sky at 24.3% compared to 18.2% in Grand island.
- Grand island has higher obesity rates at 41.0% compared to 24.1% in Big sky.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grand island at 13.0% compared to 5.0% in Big sky.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Big sky | Grand island |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.8% (1,457) |
| High School Diploma | 10.1% (284) | 16.6% (8,733) |
| Less than High School | 4.2% (118) | 20.3% (10,649) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 44.6% (1,261) | 13.3% (6,981) |
Education Levels Comparison: Big sky vs Grand island
- In Grand island, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.0% in Big sky.
- In Grand island, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.6% compared to 10.1% in Big sky.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grand island at 20.3%, compared to 4.2% in Big sky.
- A higher percentage of residents in Big sky hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.6% compared to 13.3% in Grand island.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.