Demographics details for Big sky, MT vs Godley, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Big sky, MT vs Godley, TX.
| Data | Big sky | Godley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,825 | 2,674 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $94,176 | $56,792 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Big sky vs Godley
- In Big sky, the population is higher at 2,825, compared to 2,674 in Godley.
- Residents in Big sky have a higher median age of 37.2 years compared to 33.7 years in Godley.
- Big sky has a higher median income of $94,176 compared to $56,792 in Godley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Big sky at 43.0% compared to 33.0% in Godley.
- The poverty level is higher in Godley at 11%, compared to 5% in Big sky.
- The unemployment rate in Big sky is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Godley.
Demographics
Demographics Big sky vs Godley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Big sky | Godley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 85 | 81 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Big sky vs Godley
- In Godley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Big sky.
- Big sky has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 81% in Godley.
- Both Big sky and Godley have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Godley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 12% in Big sky.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Godley at 3%, compared to 2% in Big sky.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Big sky at 1% compared to 0% in Godley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Big sky | Godley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.8% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 20.6% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 10.7% | 18.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.3% | 19.7% |
| Obesity | 24.1% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 4.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Big sky vs Godley
- In Godley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 12.8% in Big sky.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Godley at 24.3% versus 20.6% in Big sky.
- Godley has a higher smoking rate at 18.1% compared to 10.7% in Big sky.
- Binge drinking is more common in Big sky at 24.3% compared to 19.7% in Godley.
- Godley has higher obesity rates at 34.6% compared to 24.1% in Big sky.
- Disability percentages are higher in Big sky at 5.0% compared to 4.0% in Godley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Big sky | Godley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.0% (27) |
| High School Diploma | 10.1% (284) | 13.1% (350) |
| Less than High School | 4.2% (118) | 9.7% (260) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 44.6% (1,261) | 6.4% (171) |
Education Levels Comparison: Big sky vs Godley
- In Godley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Big sky.
- In Godley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.1% compared to 10.1% in Big sky.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Godley at 9.7%, compared to 4.2% in Big sky.
- A higher percentage of residents in Big sky hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.6% compared to 6.4% in Godley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.