Demographics details for Big sky, MT vs Cave creek, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Big sky, MT vs Cave creek, AZ.
| Data | Big sky | Cave creek |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,825 | 5,135 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 58.1 years |
| Median Income | $94,176 | $90,824 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Big sky vs Cave creek
- The population in Cave creek is higher at 5,135, compared to 2,825 in Big sky.
- The median age in Cave creek is higher at 58.1 years, compared to 37.2 years in Big sky.
- Big sky has a higher median income of $94,176 compared to $90,824 in Cave creek.
- In Cave creek, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 43.0% in Big sky.
- The poverty level is higher in Cave creek at 8%, compared to 5% in Big sky.
- Cave creek has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Big sky.
Demographics
Demographics Big sky vs Cave creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Big sky | Cave creek |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 85 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Big sky vs Cave creek
- In Cave creek, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Big sky.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cave creek at 88% compared to 85% in Big sky.
- In Cave creek, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Big sky.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Big sky at 12% compared to 5% in Cave creek.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cave creek at 4%, compared to 2% in Big sky.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Big sky at 1% compared to 0% in Cave creek.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Big sky | Cave creek |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.8% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 20.6% | 20.0% |
| Smoking | 10.7% | 11.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.3% | 19.5% |
| Obesity | 24.1% | 27.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Big sky vs Cave creek
- In Cave creek, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 12.8% in Big sky.
- Depression is more prevalent in Big sky at 20.6% compared to 20.0% in Cave creek.
- Cave creek has a higher smoking rate at 11.3% compared to 10.7% in Big sky.
- Binge drinking is more common in Big sky at 24.3% compared to 19.5% in Cave creek.
- Cave creek has higher obesity rates at 27.7% compared to 24.1% in Big sky.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cave creek at 14.0% compared to 5.0% in Big sky.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Big sky | Cave creek |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.0% (53) |
| High School Diploma | 10.1% (284) | 11.5% (590) |
| Less than High School | 4.2% (118) | 4.2% (218) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 44.6% (1,261) | 40.9% (2,102) |
Education Levels Comparison: Big sky vs Cave creek
- In Cave creek, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Big sky.
- In Cave creek, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.5% compared to 10.1% in Big sky.
- Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 4.2%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Big sky hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.6% compared to 40.9% in Cave creek.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.