Demographics details for Big sandy, TX vs Grafton, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Big sandy, TX vs Grafton, WI.
Data | Big sandy | Grafton |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,286 | 12,433 |
Median Age | 36.0 years | 43.8 years |
Median Income | $41,250 | $83,500 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 4% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Big sandy vs Grafton
- The population in Grafton is higher at 12,433, compared to 1,286 in Big sandy.
- The median age in Grafton is higher at 43.8 years, compared to 36.0 years in Big sandy.
- Grafton has a higher median income of $83,500, compared to $41,250 in Big sandy.
- In Grafton, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 36.0% in Big sandy.
- Big sandy has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 4% in Grafton.
- The unemployment rate in Big sandy is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Grafton.
Demographics
Demographics Big sandy vs Grafton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Big sandy | Grafton |
---|---|---|
Black | 14 | 2 |
White | 69 | 87 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 12 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Big sandy vs Grafton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Big sandy at 14% compared to 2% in Grafton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grafton at 87% compared to 69% in Big sandy.
- In Grafton, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Big sandy.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Big sandy at 12% compared to 4% in Grafton.
- Both Big sandy and Grafton have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Big sandy and Grafton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Big sandy | Grafton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 13.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 7.9% |
Depression | 25.4% | 21.0% |
Smoking | 19.8% | 11.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 25.5% |
Obesity | 35.9% | 28.5% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Big sandy vs Grafton
- More residents in Big sandy report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 13.2% in Grafton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Big sandy at 25.4% compared to 21.0% in Grafton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Big sandy at 19.8% compared to 11.6% in Grafton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grafton at 25.5% compared to 17.9% in Big sandy.
- Obesity rates are higher in Big sandy at 35.9% compared to 28.5% in Grafton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Big sandy at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Grafton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Big sandy | Grafton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (8) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 13.8% (178) | 12.9% (1,600) |
Less than High School | 23.4% (301) | 3.1% (384) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (141) | 31.8% (3,959) |
Education Levels Comparison: Big sandy vs Grafton
- A higher percentage of residents in Big sandy have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Grafton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Big sandy hold a high school diploma at 13.8% compared to 12.9% in Grafton.
- More residents in Big sandy have less than a high school education at 23.4% compared to 3.1% in Grafton.
- In Grafton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 11.0% in Big sandy.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.