Demographics details for Big bear lake, CA vs Waynesboro, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Big bear lake, CA vs Waynesboro, TN.

Data Big bear lake Waynesboro
Population 5,031 2,331
Median Age 47.5 years 43.5 years
Median Income $70,020 $27,031
Married Families 42.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 10% 18%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 5.0

Population Comparison: Big bear lake vs Waynesboro

  • In Big bear lake, the population is higher at 5,031, compared to 2,331 in Waynesboro.
  • Residents in Big bear lake have a higher median age of 47.5 years compared to 43.5 years in Waynesboro.
  • Big bear lake has a higher median income of $70,020 compared to $27,031 in Waynesboro.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Big bear lake at 42.0% compared to 32.0% in Waynesboro.
  • The poverty level is higher in Waynesboro at 18%, compared to 10% in Big bear lake.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Big bear lake and Waynesboro at 5.0%.

Demographics

Demographics Big bear lake vs Waynesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Big bear lake Waynesboro
Black Data is updating 11
White 50 77
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 30 4
Two or More Races 16 8
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Big bear lake vs Waynesboro

  • In Waynesboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 0% in Big bear lake.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Waynesboro at 77% compared to 50% in Big bear lake.
  • The Asian population is larger in Big bear lake at 3% compared to 0% in Waynesboro.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Big bear lake at 30% compared to 4% in Waynesboro.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Big bear lake at 16% compared to 8% in Waynesboro.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Big bear lake at 1% compared to 0% in Waynesboro.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Big bear lake Waynesboro
Mental Health Not Good 17.4% 20.5%
Physical Health Not Good 12.1% 14.4%
Depression 20.5% 29.8%
Smoking 14.1% 24.4%
Binge Drinking 17.0% 15.8%
Obesity 37.0% 35.4%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 23.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Big bear lake vs Waynesboro

  • In Waynesboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 17.4% in Big bear lake.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Waynesboro at 29.8% versus 20.5% in Big bear lake.
  • Waynesboro has a higher smoking rate at 24.4% compared to 14.1% in Big bear lake.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Big bear lake at 17.0% compared to 15.8% in Waynesboro.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Big bear lake at 37.0% compared to 35.4% in Waynesboro.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waynesboro at 23.0% compared to 9.0% in Big bear lake.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Big bear lake Waynesboro
No Schooling 0.7% (37) 1.0% (23)
High School Diploma 16.4% (825) 24.5% (572)
Less than High School 12.6% (634) 30.5% (710)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 25.7% (1,294) 9.4% (220)

Education Levels Comparison: Big bear lake vs Waynesboro

  • In Waynesboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.7% in Big bear lake.
  • In Waynesboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 16.4% in Big bear lake.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Waynesboro at 30.5%, compared to 12.6% in Big bear lake.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Big bear lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.7% compared to 9.4% in Waynesboro.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.