Demographics details for Big bear lake, CA vs Quincy, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Big bear lake, CA vs Quincy, MA.
Data | Big bear lake | Quincy |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,031 | 101,727 |
Median Age | 47.5 years | 38.3 years |
Median Income | $70,020 | $90,668 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Big bear lake vs Quincy
- The population in Quincy is higher at 101,727, compared to 5,031 in Big bear lake.
- Residents in Big bear lake have a higher median age of 47.5 years compared to 38.3 years in Quincy.
- Quincy has a higher median income of $90,668, compared to $70,020 in Big bear lake.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Big bear lake at 42.0% compared to 39.0% in Quincy.
- Big bear lake has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Quincy.
- The unemployment rate in Big bear lake is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.1% in Quincy.
Demographics
Demographics Big bear lake vs Quincy provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Big bear lake | Quincy |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 6 |
White | 50 | 55 |
Asian | 3 | 29 |
Hispanic | 30 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 16 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Big bear lake vs Quincy
- In Quincy, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Big bear lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Quincy at 55% compared to 50% in Big bear lake.
- In Quincy, the Asian population stands at 29%, greater than 3% in Big bear lake.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Big bear lake at 30% compared to 5% in Quincy.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Big bear lake at 16% compared to 5% in Quincy.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Big bear lake at 1% compared to 0% in Quincy.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Big bear lake | Quincy |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 14.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 9.4% |
Depression | 20.5% | 20.0% |
Smoking | 14.1% | 13.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 17.2% |
Obesity | 37.0% | 24.6% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Big bear lake vs Quincy
- More residents in Big bear lake report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 14.9% in Quincy.
- Depression is more prevalent in Big bear lake at 20.5% compared to 20.0% in Quincy.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Big bear lake at 14.1% compared to 13.5% in Quincy.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Quincy at 17.2% compared to 17.0% in Big bear lake.
- Obesity rates are higher in Big bear lake at 37.0% compared to 24.6% in Quincy.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Quincy at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Big bear lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Big bear lake | Quincy |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (37) | 2.5% (2,554) |
High School Diploma | 16.4% (825) | 14.7% (14,934) |
Less than High School | 12.6% (634) | 10.4% (10,588) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.7% (1,294) | 36.0% (36,574) |
Education Levels Comparison: Big bear lake vs Quincy
- In Quincy, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.7% in Big bear lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Big bear lake hold a high school diploma at 16.4% compared to 14.7% in Quincy.
- More residents in Big bear lake have less than a high school education at 12.6% compared to 10.4% in Quincy.
- In Quincy, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 25.7% in Big bear lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.